|

POSTED 14 JULY, 2008
Galatians
3:24-25:
Are Messianic Youth Properly Trained in the
Torah and All the Scriptures?
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
|
GALATIANS 3:24-25 ―
ENGLISH |
|
Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us
to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith. But now
that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor (NASU).
so that the law became our child-conductor – to Christ,
that by faith we may be declared righteous, and the
faith having come, no more under a child-conductor are
we (YLT).
So then, the Law/Torah pedagogue our became to/toward Messiah, in
order that out of faith we might be justified. Came but
the faith no longer under pedagogue we are (author’s
literal translation)
So then, the Torah became our pedagogue [to lead us]
toward Messiah, in order that we might be justified out
of faith. But [with] the faith having come, we are no
longer under a pedagogue
(author’s translation).
|
|
GALATIANS 3:24-25 ―
GREEK |
|
hōste ho nomos paidagōgos hēmōn gegonen eis Christon,
hina ek pisteōs dikaiōthōmen elthousēs de tēs pisteōs
ouketi hupo paidagōgon esmen.
wste o nomoß paidagwgoß hmwn gegonen eiß Criston ina ek
pistewß dikaiwqwmen elqoushß de thß pistewß ouketi upo
paidagwgon esmen
|
Galatians 3:24-25 are some difficult verses for
today’s Messianic Believers to contemplate.[1]
Many commentators are in rightful agreement that
“tutor” is not the best rendering of the Greek
word paidagōgos (paidagwgoß),
as there is something specifically to be
understood from this term in antiquity. In
Galatians 3:24, we actually see Paul using a
classical Greek term to express a Jewish
concept.[2]
BDAG indicates, “Orig. ‘boy-leader’, the
man, usu.[ally] a slave…whose duty it was to
conduct a boy or youth…to and from school and to
superintend his conduct gener.; he was not a
‘teacher’…When the young man became of age, the
p[aidagwgoß]
was no longer needed.”[3]
In a classical sense, the paidagōgos was
a protector who was to guard young boys on their
way to school until they reached a certain age.
This “disciplinarian” (NRSV) or “guardian” (ESV)
would try to instill in the boys a basic sense
of who a responsible citizen was until the boys
were old enough to take care of themselves. As
Plato would describe it, “Our sharp-eyed and
efficient supervisor of the education of the
young must redirect their natural development
along the right lines, by always setting them on
the paths of goodness as embodied in the legal
code” (Laws 7.809).[4]
Having to explain that the Torah is to function
as a paidagōgos that was “to bring us
to Christ” (NKJV) is a strong indication on
Paul’s part that his audience is still
relatively new in their faith. Paul must
appropriate elements from the Galatians’ own
dominant culture to make a very Jewish point.
Paul later will indicate that the role of the
Torah is to reveal the sin in a person (Romans
7:7-9; 1 Corinthians 15:56), meaning that sin
can only be revealed if a person has been taught
sufficiently from the Torah’s commandments and
knows instinctively that change needs to take
place.
Many will argue from Galatians 3:24-25 that the
Torah is now unimportant for Believers in Yeshua
today. But is the Torah as a whole no longer
necessary? When the Messiah was revealed, did
the Torah cease to be God’s Word? Or,
when Yeshua arrives on the scene (particularly
in the life of an individual) does the Torah
take on a new function? Ben Witherington III
sadly does conclude, “Paul’s metaphor here
suggests that the pedagogue was for Jews
before the time of Christ, and now that Christ
has come no one needs or is required
to submit to it.”[5]
He only argues that the Torah was to serve in
revealing to Jews the Messiah to come. Yet, the
perfect verb gegonen (gegonen)
indicates that the training of the paidagōgos
continues to have an effect. It has every bit as
much of an effect as the fulfilled prophecies
that speak of the Messiah’s arrival. When
Matthew’s Gospel asserts, “Now all this took
place [gegonen] to fulfill what was
spoken by the Lord through the prophet” (Matthew
1:22), are we expected to throw away and ignore
the prophecies now that they have been fulfilled
via the Incarnation of Yeshua? Or are we to
understand them in a new light?
Paul states the function of the Torah as a
paidagōgos, a pedagogue that is to train one
in the basic essentials for living. But did the
Torah have only a temporary role for God’s
corporate people? Such a view is not supported
by understanding the background of Paul’s
letter. Note that the Torah did indeed play a
role in the Galatians’ own salvation experience.
Paul’s visit to Southern Galatia in Acts chs.
13-14 reveals that he certainly taught about
Yeshua from the Torah and Prophets! Why would
Paul have done this if he thought that the Torah
only played a temporary role in God’s plan of
salvation history, and a role that would have
only been limited to Israel? What part of God’s
Law going forth from Zion to the nations have
some interpreters missed (Isaiah 2:3; Micah
4:2)?
If we understand Paul’s admonition as referring
to individuals, is the Torah to play this role
for a certain season in one’s life? Witherington
asserts that “the pedagogue [of the Law] is
replaced in the life of the Christian by other
things, namely: (1) the example of Christ; (2)
the ‘Law’ or principle of Christ; and (3) the
Holy Spirit.”[6]
None of us should disagree that these qualities
are important. But how can we truly understand
these things as the Messiah Himself and the
Apostles would have understood them
without understanding the message of the
Torah and Tanach? How can we be everything that
Yeshua was without adhering to a Torah ethic?
Simply stating that one must follow the example
of Christ and the Holy Spirit is too vague
without given proper boundaries. John Wesley
describes the close relationship between belief
in Yeshua and the role of the Torah in his
sermon “Properties of the Law”:
“I cannot spare the law one moment, no more than
I can spare Christ: seeing I now want it as
much, to keep me to Christ, as I ever wanted it
to bring me to him…Indeed each is continually
sending me to the other,—the law to Christ, and
Christ to the law. On the one hand, the height
and depth of the law constrain me to fly to the
love of God in Christ; on the other, the love of
God in Christ endears the law to me ‘above gold
or precious stones;’ seeing I know every part of
it is a gracious promise, which my Lord will
fulfill in its season.”[7]
Is Paul’s vantage point in Galatians 3:24 that
the Torah functions only as the Jews’
disciplinarian (something that he has been
“freed from”), or the disciplinarian of the
individual prior to receiving the gospel and
being transformed? If Paul is speaking to his
“brethren” (Galatians 3:15) in Yeshua in
Galatia, then surely the Torah has played a role
for all of them—both Jewish and
non-Jewish—“so that we [plural] might be
justified by faith.” The Torah served as a
paidagōgos for all of them in their
salvation experience. The Torah played a role in
them understanding their sin nature and how they
failed to live up to its high and holy standard.
More importantly, the Torah showed them their
need for a Redeemer.
In Galatians 3:25 Paul can say, “But now that
faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor,”
hupo paidagōgon (upo
paidagwgon).
Does this mean that the principles that the
Torah was to instill in us should be cast aside?
Or, when one comes to faith in Messiah has the
Torah’s function as a pedagogue ended?
Are the ethics and morality of the Torah no
longer important?
I would argue that Paul’s Rabbinical training
and him comparing the Torah to a
“disciplinarian” (NRSV) is comparable to what
happens to Jewish boys prior to bar mitzvah
(hcm
rb).
4 Maccabees 1:17 attests that there is
“education in the law, by which we learn divine
matters reverently and human affairs to our
advantage.” The Torah as pedagogue is to train
young people in the basic principles of right
and wrong, instilling in them the proper ethos
that God wants them to have. When the young
person reaches an age of adolescence, he then
has to take responsibility for his own actions.
From this perspective, God’s commandments are
rigorously instilled in an individual so that by
the time a young person goes through his bar
mitzvah he can be considered a man. Bar
Mitzvah means a “son of the commandments.”
At the age of 12-13, one who goes through his
bar mitzvah recognizes that he is
accountable for knowing what the God of Israel
considers sin and does not consider sin. He is
accountable for the penalties of sin and is
fully aware of his sin nature.
The practice of preparing a youth for bar mitzvah is to
instill in the boy or girl the understanding
that he or she is accountable for living up to
the Torah’s standards. The Torah up to this
point serves as the person’s “tutor” or
“schoolmaster” (KJV), and hopefully when the
youth gets up to the bema to read from the Torah
scroll and be bar mitzvahed, the person
has an understanding that what he or she is
doing is very serious in the eyes of the God of
Israel. This is how the Torah is to serve as a
pedagogue.
Paul is alluding to the fact that individuals are to be shown their
sin from the Torah, and that prior to coming to
faith in Yeshua the Torah preserved us
spiritually in the sense that it showed us what
was right and what was wrong. Note that Paul
does believe that even without the Torah proper,
pagans still have a witness of its morality via
their human conscience (Romans 2:14-15).
Eventually, each person would come to the point
where he realizes that as a human being he
cannot fully attain to God’s high and holy
standard, and a Redeemer is needed. The Torah
reveals sin and thus points us to Messiah Yeshua.
This is why Paul can write, “For
the goal at which the Torah aims is the
Messiah, who offers righteousness to everyone
who trusts” (CJB). Yeshua is to be the
ultimate aim or telos (teloß)
of the Torah.
But once a person has arrived at the telos, faith and
redemption in Messiah Yeshua, what is to be done
with the pedagogue, the Torah? Considering that
born again Believers are not “under a tutor,” is
the Torah no longer important? Some would argue
so. However, the essence of the New Covenant is
that “I
will put My law within them and on their heart I
will write it; and I will be their God, and they
shall be My people” (Jeremiah 31:33). No longer
must the Torah function as a disciplinarian or
guardian, because the Torah’s principles are
written onto the heart of the redeemed person.
Tim Hegg concurs,
“[I]n the metaphor Paul uses, when one has
arrived at the teacher, one does not therefore
despise the pedagogue who lead him there!
If anything, one is more appreciative of the
custodian because he has performed his duties
faithfully. In the same way, when a sinner comes
to realize that he is unable to remedy himself
of his guilt, and when the Torah leads the
sinner to Yeshua, the only remedy for sin, he is
forever grateful for the role of the Torah in
leading to Yeshua. Far from considering the
Torah to have been worthless, he recognizes the
strategic role it has played.”[8]
Indeed, one must recognize that in the Torah God’s people are
called to be “a
kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus
19:6). God’s people are called to be a missional
community active in the world, making a
difference. Any good Christian theologian agrees
with this. Having the Torah’s principles imbued
into the human person empowered by God’s Spirit
makes the Torah even more important
following salvation—not less important.
What might this view of Galatians 3:24-25 mean
for today’s emerging Messianic movement?
Are Messianic youth properly being trained up?
When we consider Paul’s description of the Torah as serving as a
pedagogue, some difficult questions are asked of
us as Believers considering whether or not we
were actually trained in the basics of the
Torah. If Paul intends the Torah to serve as a
pedagogue for all, or at least most, who come to
faith in Yeshua, what is this to say about
Christians—and also Messianics—today? Are any of
us properly trained in the Torah? What role does
the Torah play in showing us our depravity as
sinners, and our inherent need for a Divine
Savior?
One of the most confusing passages in the Bible for many today is
Yeshua’s words, “Truly
I say to you, whoever does not receive the
kingdom of God like a child will not enter it
at all” (Mark 10:15; cf. Matthew 19:14).
Many in the contemporary Church have concluded
that what Yeshua is saying here is that the best
time to receive salvation is when one is a small
child. The problem with this is that a small
child cannot understand his or her sin nature
as demonstrated by Scripture. A small child
might have some kind of rudimentary
understanding of right and wrong, and a small
child might understand some of God’s love—but a
small child cannot comprehend his or her
sin nature, knowing that condemned sinners are
worthy of eternal punishment.
The purpose of the Torah as pedagogue is to train individuals in
what the God of Israel considers acceptable and
unacceptable behavior, clearly laying forth the
penalties of disobedience to Him. The Rabbinical
dictum based on Deuteronomy 1:39 argues that it
takes about twelve years for a child to be
prepared for adulthood, knowing the principles
of right and wrong, and the responsibilities
that one is to undertake as a member of the
Jewish community. During the years between birth
and bar/bat mitzvah, Jewish children are
trained in the commandments of the Torah and
principles of the Tanach, to prepare them to be
accountable. Often this is accompanied with some
kind of Hebrew study, with the youth also
becoming familiar with Jewish history and
tradition.
Interestingly enough, many Protestant denominations follow a
similar, yet less rigorous process with
confirmation. Youth preparing to enter their
teens go through confirmation classes by
learning the basic stories and principles of the
Bible, Christian history, the traditions of the
denomination, and their role as young people in
the contemporary Church. Confirmation classes
are often held separately from Sunday School,
even though they take on a similar format.
I can remember in 1993 going through confirmation classes in the
United Methodist Church, where I went to take
several weeks of classes independent of Sunday
School, and our pastor took about a dozen or so
male youth on a day-long houseboat cruise on the
Ohio River. We read Scripture passages, we
prayed, and we discussed issues that were
pertinent to us as young people. One of the
prominent issues that we discussed, especially
as many of us were just entering puberty, was
human sexuality. The issue had actually been
forced because we had all stopped at a truck
stop on the way to the marina, and several of us
had noticed a condom dispenser in the men’s
room. Some did not know what this was, and our
pastor was very gracious to discuss the issue.
While none of us were Messianic, we certainly
did focus on God’s commandments and moral
expectations of us that afternoon.
How many of us were trained in the truths of the Torah—even if they
were just the Ten Commandments from a limited
Christian understanding—that we were sinners in
the eyes of God and needed His salvation? How
many of us had the Torah guarding us while we
were young, so that in the future when we
reached a point of maturity, we no longer had to
be reminded of the basic truths of what was sin
and not sin? Did we ever have the Torah function
as a pedagogue for us in any capacity?
James Montgomery Boice makes the surprising observation, “the
experience of passing from law to promise needs
to be repeated in everyone who comes to faith in
Christ Jesus, for the law condemns in order that
faith might make alive.”[9]
Boice is correct; all sinners must be
shown their sin from their violation of God’s
Law. But how often does this actually happen in
the Christian Church today? In a Christian
Church that has largely sluffed away the Torah,
are new converts to Christ actually shown their
sin from the Torah, told that they need to
confess and repent of this sin, and once
redeemed disciplined in a life of holiness?
While we cannot speak in broad terms, the
problems that the contemporary Church faces
today are a direct result of the fact that
this largely does not happen. The majority
of people who profess faith in Yeshua did not
have the Torah serve as their pedagogue.
It is not that difficult to enter into a Messianic congregation or
fellowship today and discover that a great deal
of teaching emphasis is placed on the Torah. The
weekly Torah cycle often dominates a Shabbat
teaching. It is certainly good for Messianic
congregations to focus on Scriptures that too
many of our Christian brethren ignore. We need
to know the essential stories and foundational
decrees that compose our faith, and ultimately
our belief in Yeshua. We need to know what the
God of Israel considers proper and improper
behavior, and have a firm theological foundation
that begins with Genesis. But what is actually
discussed from the weekly parashah, and
how the material is delivered is a much more
complicated issue. Does the Torah actually guide
us as a standard of holiness?
It has been my observation over the past ten years (1997-2007) that
the Messianic community as a whole largely
does not understand the proper role that the
Torah is to play as pedagogue. The Torah as
pedagogue is to train people on the way to
salvation in what God considers to be righteous
and unrighteous. The Torah following salvation
is by no means to be discarded, but can then
serve as the “ethos statement” of one’s life, as
consistent study of the Torah as God’s Word is
to then enable a person to fulfill His Divine
mission. Prior to salvation, the Torah serves as
a person’s pedagogue, and after salvation it
serves as a person’s assignment book from the
Holy One.
This is largely what we do not see in many Messianic congregations.
For too many of our Messianic brethren, Torah
observance is used to “prove” to others that
they are “better” than our Christian brethren.
Torah observance is not adopted as a proper way
of holy living, but to indeed demonstrate
“superior sanctity.” Torah teachers who adopt
this approach often do not teach from the
Torah’s instruction as a pedagogue would,
challenging Messianic Believers with whether or
not they have truly lived up to God’s high
standard. Instead, too much of the “Torah
teaching” we are submitted to is largely
disengaged from the ethical and moral demands of
the text, and the weekly parashah is
largely used as a springboard for teachers to
“rant” on either the ills of Christianity or
society—rather than used as a place for
providing solutions. And worse enough, the
solution to the world’s problems, Yeshua the
Messiah, is often not provided. Notably, in
the twelve years (since 1995) I have been in the
Messianic movement, pertinent issues like
sexuality (which the Torah certainly talks
about) have never been discussed at any
of the youth or adult meetings I have
been a part of.
The impact that this has on Messianic youth is going to be quite
severe if things do not begin to change. Are
Messianic youth being properly trained in the
Torah? Certainly, there are many good traditions
from the Jewish practice of bar/bat mitzvah
that should be integrated into our
congregations. I think it is a good thing for a
young boy or girl to learn some Hebrew to read
his or her parashah, and that young
people should be honored by the adults as they
enter into their “adulthood” and begin to take
positions of responsibility in the assembly. But
preparing for bar/bat mitzvah should be
more than just learning some Hebrew and having a
party. We should integrate the elements of the
Christian confirmation, where the ethical and
moral issues that directly concern today’s teens
should be discussed. Yet, how can we address
those issues with youth if we do not even
address them with adults?
Many Messianic congregations do not have a large number of youth
(at least today) to warrant bar/bat mitzvah
classes. At most, such youth prior to bar/bat
mitzvah might have a few consultations with
their rabbi, pastor, or congregational leader.
This means it is incumbent upon such a leader to
make sure that the youth are trained from the
bema/pulpit in the proper principles of life
during the weekly Shabbat service.
Furthermore, to limit the youth or anyone to
exclusively the Torah, and not to provide
teachings from the Prophets or Apostolic
Scriptures, is also a severe mistake. Messianic
youth preparing for bar/bat mitzvah need
to know the commandments of the Torah, the
stories of the Bible, and the essentials of the
gospel. If they have truly not had a born again
experience by this point in time, the bar/bat
mitzvah process should be so serious that
a true conversion should follow shortly
thereafter.
Questions are being asked today not only about how we properly
teach from the Torah (not avoiding some of its
controversial issues), but also how we are to
have more well-rounded teachings from all parts
of the Bible. Too many Messianic assemblies
exclusively analyze the Torah. Sadly, they
may be just as theologically neutered as those
in the Christian Church who just focus on the
“New Testament.” Likewise, people attending a
congregation where not only the same parashah
is addressed every year, but the teaching every
year is on the exact same points of the
parashah, can become dis-empowered from
fulfilling God’s purpose for their lives. The
Torah can become stale, dis-enlivened, and also
boring. This need not take place with a Bible as
big as we have. People need to know about the
results of disobedience to God, as seen all
throughout the histories and Prophets of the
Tanach, and most importantly the life and
ministry of Yeshua the Messiah who came to bring
us all salvation.
We need to have leaders and teachers with discernment, who can
appropriate themes and broad principles from the
Torah, connecting them to other parts of the
Bible when they stand before the congregation to
speak. Youth, as well as adults, are listening
and looking for an appropriate model to emulate.
Some congregations desperately need to consider
the example seen in Pisidian Antioch (Acts
13:15-16)—one of the Galatian
congregations—where short teachings from the
Torah and the Prophets were given. A similar
format needs to be adapted whereby a small 15-20
minute Torah teaching could be offered, later
followed by an actual 30-45 minute sermon that
might take a broad theme seen in the weekly
parashah, or address other pertinent issues
facing the local assembly and/or community.[10]
J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net)
and is a Messianic apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah, Torah In the
Balance, Volume I, and When Will the Messiah Return?.
He has also written many articles on the Two Houses of Israel
and Biblical theology, and is presently focusing on Messianic
commentaries on various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
Sections of this article have been
adapted from the editor’s commentary
Galatians for
the Practical Messianic,
second edition (Kissimmee, FL: TNN
Press, 2007).
[2]
The term “pedagogue”
does appear as a borrowed term in
some Jewish literature (Richard N.
Longenecker, Word Biblical
Commentary: Galatians, Vol. 41
[Nashville: Nelson Reference &
Electronic, 1990], pp 146-148).
[3]
Frederick William
Danker, ed., et. al.,
A Greek-English
Lexicon of the New Testament and
Other Early Christian Literature,
third edition (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 2000), 748.
[4]
Plato: The Laws,
trans. Trevor J. Saunders (London:
Penguin Books, 1970), 253.
[5]
Ben Witherington III,
Grace in Galatia: A Commentary on
Paul’s Letter to the Galatians
(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998).,
267.
[6]
Ibid., 266.
[7]
N. Burwash, ed.,
Wesley’s Doctrinal Standards Part I:
The Sermons, with Introductions,
Analysis, and Notes (Salem, OH:
Schmul Publishing, 1988), 350.
[8]
Tim Hegg, A Study
of Galatians (Tacoma, WA:
TorahResource, 2002), 130.
[9]
James Montgomery
Boice, “Galatians,” in Frank E.
Gaebelein, ed. et. al,
Expositor’s Bible Commentary, 12
vols. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan,
1981), 10:467-468.
[10]
A further examination
of Galatians 3:24-25, along with
some further exegetical details and
engagement with commentators’
opinions, is provided in the before
mentioned
Galatians for
the Practical Messianic,
second edition.
|