|

POSTED 01 SEPTEMBER, 2000
What is the Mark of the Beast?
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
“And he causes all, the small and
the great, and the rich and the poor, and the
free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on
their right hand or on their forehead, and he
provides that no one will be able to buy or
to sell, except the one who has the mark,
either the name of the beast or the number
of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him who has
understanding calculate the number of the beast,
for the number is that of a man; and his number
is six hundred and sixty-six” (Revelation
13:16-18).
Students of Bible
prophecy have always been intrigued by
Revelation 13:16-18 and the questions that these
verses pose. The mark of the beast, knowing it,
and understanding what it is, have caused much
speculation and controversy. This controversy
will only continue as the Lord tarries and the
Messiah has yet to return.
What is the mark of the beast and
what is its purpose? How close is global society
to its implementation? These are only a few of
the key questions surrounding this phenomenon
that we will discuss, including several views
which you may consider “unique.”
What Some People Believe the Mark
of the Beast is, or will be
There are a wide variety of views
as to what the mark of the beast is. Here is a
listing of what some people believe it will be:
1.
A microchip implant
2.
A tattoo or barcode
3.
A biological component
4.
Spiritual devotion to Satan
5.
Non-observance of the
seventh-day Sabbath
The first three
views listed are consistent with the standard
evangelical Christian views of pre-millennial
eschatology present today. The fourth view is
one that we should all agree exists, as the mark
is of “the beast,” the antimessiah/antichrist
who will be under the complete control of Satan
during the Tribulation period, and is a symbol
of one’s devotion to him. The fifth view,
non-observance of the seventh-day Sabbath, is
somewhat foreign to those in mainstream
Christianity, and many in Sabbath-observing
Messianic circles dismiss this view as well. In
a search for Biblical accuracy, we will analyze
all of these views, comparing these phenomena to
both modern societal trends and religious
opinions.
Many of the prophetic writings of
the Bible are symbolic or allegorical. These
include Nebuchadnezzar’s vision of the statue
(Daniel 2:1-39), Daniel’s vision of the four
beasts (Daniel 7:1-24), and the beast that comes
out of the sea (Revelation 13:1-8). There are
more literal passages of the Bible dealing with
prophecy such as Yeshua’s Olivet Discourse
(Matthew 24; Mark 13; Luke 21). In addition to
this, there are parables given by the Lord such
as the parable of the evil slave (Matthew
24:45-51) or the ten virgins (Matthew 25:1-13),
stories which are to admonish the Believer to be
on alert to His return. So, when dealing with
the mark of the beast, one must wonder, are
these literal, symbolic, or parabolic passages
we are dealing with?
The Mark Used for Commerce and
Identification
The most common teaching we hear
today is that the mark of the beast will be used
for commerce and identification, as Revelation
13:17 tells us “no one could buy or sell unless
he had the mark, which is the name of the beast
or the number of his name” (NIV).
Since the Scriptures tell us that
the mark of the beast is used “that no one will
be able to buy or to sell” (NASU), it would
appear that we are taking about an actual device
or object used for commerce. Many prophecy
teachers today have extrapolated upon this view
and concluded that perhaps the mark will also be
used as a tool of identification as well.
By far, the most common view in
the pre-millennial prophecy circles today,
assuming the mark of the beast will arrive on
the scene in the coming decade, is that it
will be a microchip implant. It is already well
known that animals in various locations are
being implanted with microchips for
identification and tracking. Now, similar
devices are being marked for humans. In December
1999, Applied Digital Solutions received the
first patents to a device that they call Digital
Angel:
“Applied Digital Solutions, Inc…today announced
that it has acquired the patent rights to a
miniature digital transceiver—which it has named
‘Digital Angel®’—that can be used for a variety
of purposes, such as providing a tamper-proof
means of identification for enhanced e-business
security, locating lost or missing individuals,
tracking the location of valuable property and
monitoring the medical conditions of at-risk
patients.”[1]
While additional companies have
since acquired similar licenses to produce
digital tracking technology for humans, and the
technology has become more efficient and less
cumbersome, the reasons in support for this have
grown. The advent of global terror since
September 11, 2001 has increased the need for
identification of human persons, and the ability
to know where “authorized” individuals are,
versus those who are “unauthorized.”
Socially speaking, there are
“logical” reasons why one would want to receive
a microchip implant under his or her skin for
tracking. It is a definite form of
identification. A person would not have to
necessarily worry about a driver’s license,
passport, or even paper currency. All of these
would be performed electronically, and one’s
location could be pinpointed by satellites at
all times. You would never get lost. Everything
would be electronic.
Ten years ago there was a
terrible airline crash in the Florida
Everglades. On May 11, 1996 a ValuJet DC-9 took
off from Miami and crashed just twenty minutes
or so after takeoff. If you remember the stories
surrounding this crash, there was an
inconsistent passenger manifest. There was no
definite way of knowing if there were additional
people on the flight than originally intended,
or if someone decided to board at the last
minute or swap tickets with someone. Once the
aircraft disappeared into the Florida swamps,
all that remained were a few fragments of the
fuselage. As far as we know, the remains of the
passengers were either buried under mud,
scattered throughout the debris, or gator food.
What would have happened if all
of the passengers had a microchip implanted
somewhere in their bodies for identification?
First of all, upon boarding the aircraft there
would have been a computer-logged registry of
the passengers. Secondly, those investigating
the crash would have had a much better idea who
was on the flight, and quite possibly, the
location of certain remains could have been
detected.
We should all be familiar with
the fact that the days prior to the Messiah’s
return will be very unstable. The ValuJet
accident was not the result of terrorism, but
rather faulty mechanics. But consider what would
have happened if everyone boarding the American
and United flights on September 11, 2001 were
logged in with a microchip implant.
Investigators would have had an easier time
identifying the rogues, as well as the people
missing, in their examination.
Is some form of mandatory
physical identification a coming reality for
the people of Planet Earth? Although I do not
want to be viewed as being presumptuous or fear
mongering, with the advent of the Electronic Age
and the Internet, the need for definite security
and identification is on the extreme rise. To
dispense with this entirely is to underestimate
what technology is capable of. While socially
there may be an extreme distrust with a “Big
Brother” system, nevertheless as threats in the
world become more severe there will rise
“legitimate” reasons to want to “tag” people.
The Biological Mark?
Continuing on with the notion
that the mark of the beast is used for commerce,
what happens if the mark is not some form of
microchip implant? In the past, prophecy
teachers have usually compared the prophecies of
the mark of the beast to the technology level
that existed, and made appropriate comparisons.
Thirty years ago, the view that was held
concerning the mark was that it was going to be
a tattoo. Today, the common view is that it will
be a microchip. But what about tomorrow? What if
the mark does not arrive until an age when
silicon based computers are a thing of the past?
Revelation 16:2 tells us that at
the pouring of the first vial of God’s anger
there will appear “a loathsome and malignant
sore on the people who had the mark of the beast
and who worshiped his image.” Clearly, the mark
of the beast is going to be a physical implement
that one receives on his or her person, so that
at the first vial judgment those who have it
receive “ugly and painful sores” (NIV). If the
mark of the beast is to be a microchip, could
some of the chip’s components malfunction
causing toxins to be released into the human
body causing some sort of boil?
There is, however, another factor
we must consider, especially if the
Tribulation period is not to come for several
decades (or not even in our lifetimes) as I
believe. What if the mark of the beast is not
going to be a silicon implant, as many currently
believe?
Some scientists are suggesting that the silicon
chip may not last long into the Twenty-First
Century. Once conventional microchips are
obsolete, what sort of technology will we have
to turn to? Dr. David Whitehouse, the scientific
consultant for the BBC, writes that “perhaps in
the drive to build faster, more powerful and
smaller computers we will turn to biological
molecules and harness the power of DNA than try
to push electrons along arcades of silicon
atoms.”[2]
It appears as if the alternative
to a silicon-based mark of the beast may lie in
something that sounds like it is directly out of
science fiction. Interestingly enough, it is
from this genre that we can probably find the
best example. In the sci-fi television series
Earth: Final Conflict, the world is in
cooperation with an alien race known as the
Taelons who have recruited various humans for
their personal protection. These agents are
implanted with what is called a skrill, a
living bio-weapon that also increases their
psychological loyalty to the aliens.
Since before the year 2000, there
have been many who have spoken presumptuously in
regard to the Second Coming of the Messiah, in
both the pre- and post-tribulational
camps. Many have used fear of “the chip” to
either “gain converts” or increase the business
of their ministries. Such fear has been picked
up by the secular media, and many secular
citizens shun the idea of a microchip implant
today or have been totally seared against it.
Many, even though not religious, oppose the idea
of receiving any kind of microchip for
identification—or for that same matter any kind
of identification card beyond a driver’s license
or passport.
However, if in the future a
biologically-based computer component arises for
identification, would people be more apt to
receive it? If a scientist could take a person’s
organic cells and grow a “living computer,”
which would integrate with a worldwide network,
would people be more receptive? I certainly
believe so and concur that something made of
mutated cells could very well cause the same
“deadly sore affect” as a microchip would. But
this technology is a long way from being fully
developed.
The Sabbath Factor
One issue that very few
evangelicals have opened dialogue about is the
Sabbath observance question that arises when
dealing with the mark of the beast. This is in
part because some groups—often from the
fringe—advocate that non-observance of the
seventh-day Sabbath is the mark of the beast.
They usually have false beliefs associated with
them about the Divinity of Yeshua, salvation,
and the afterlife. Because of these factors, the
view is often immediately dismissed. However,
with the growth of the Messianic movement, some
have begun to consider that one who does not
keep Shabbat has the “mark of the beast.”
Historically, Protestant Christianity has
considered itself “Sabbath honoring,” but it has
viewed the Fourth Commandment (Exodus 20:8-11)
as applying to Sunday and not to Saturday. For
this reason, many in evangelical groups today
totally dismiss the belief that the mark of the
beast is non-Sabbath observance, because they
may be forced to deal with this issue. Although
it is not my intent to unfairly judge
Christians, this is a subject that needs to be
brought to the table. As Messianic Believers who
desire to live the life of Messiah Yeshua, we
firmly believe that the seventh-day Sabbath or
Shabbat is to be honored and that we
should obey the Torah.[3]
In Acts 15:19-21,
we are told the requirements that James the Just
set forth for the non-Jews who were coming to
faith in Messiah Yeshua:
“Therefore it is
my judgment that we do not trouble those who are
turning to God from among the Gentiles, but that
we write to them that they abstain from things
contaminated by idols and from fornication and
from what is strangled and from blood. For Moses
from ancient generations has in every city those
who preach him, since he is read in the
synagogues every Sabbath” (Acts 15:19-21).
One of the expectations implied in Acts 15:21 is
that non-Jews coming to faith would be expected
to attend synagogue and learn the Law of Moses.
Paul writes in Ephesians 2:11-12 that non-Jewish
Believers have become part of the Commonwealth
of Israel via their faith in Yeshua, not a
separate entity known as “the Church.”[4]
Our Heavenly Father tells us in Exodus 31:13, “But
as for you, speak to the sons of Israel, saying,
‘You shall surely observe My sabbaths; for
this is a sign between Me and you throughout
your generations, that you may know that I am
the Lord
who sanctifies you.’” So, the question of
whether or not we are to keep the seventh-day
Sabbath is a question of whether Believers
are to be holy or set-apart unto God.
Interestingly enough, during the Tribulation
period people will be given the choice of either
choosing God or choosing Satan—so
the question of being consecrated or set-apart
unto the Lord remains critical.
However, what is the Sabbath’s
relation to the mark of the beast, if any?
Stereotypically, aberrant or unorthodox groups
are the ones that have advocated that
non-observance of the seventh-day Sabbath is the
mark of the beast. Have we suddenly gone their
way? Not at all, in fact, although we maintain a
pro-Sabbath and pro-Torah position, as does most
of the Messianic movement,
we do not believe that
non-observance of the seventh-day Sabbath is the
mark of the beast.
Some have made the argument that
the “sign” or “mark” of God is keeping His
appointed times, on the basis of Scriptures such
as Exodus 13:9: “And it shall serve as a sign to
you on your hand, and as a reminder on your
forehead, that the law of the
Lord
may be in your mouth; for with a powerful hand
the Lord brought you out of Egypt.” The Hebrew word for sign is
ot (tAa),
meaning “sign, pledge, token” (BDB).[5]
Some have said that those who have the “mark of
the beast,” in contrast to this, are doing
things contrary to what God has decreed. As the
seventh-day Sabbath was given as a major sign to
Israel, it is argued that the absence of
Sabbath-keeping is the “mark of the beast.”
This view, however, has some
serious exegetical flaws. While anyone who
receives the mark of the beast in the Book of
Revelation is certainly doing things contrary to
the will of God, and is committing himself to
Satan, the vocabulary used to describe the mark
of the beast and keeping God’s appointed times
is totally different. Ot is translated as
sēmeion (shmeion)
in the Septuagint, meaning “a
sign, a mark, token,”
or quite possibly also “in reasoning, a sign
or proof” (LS).[6]
The Revelation account, describing the “mark of
the beast,” employs the term charagma (caragma),
“a
mark that is engraved, etched, branded, cut,
imprinted,
mark, stamp”
(BDAG).[7]
The mark of the beast is clearly something that
is physical, as opposed to something primarily
ideological such as the Sabbath.
How are a physical mark and the
Sabbath question possibly tied together?
Even if the mark of the beast is
not failing to keep the Sabbath, this does not
mean that it cannot in some way be related. The
mark of the beast is a physical manifestation of
a person’s rebellion toward God. In the final
days before the Messiah’s return, human beings
will be given the clear choice of either
receiving the salvation available in Yeshua, or
rejecting it. Those who reject the Lord will
receive the mark of the beast—be it a microchip
or biological implant. There will be a clear
distinction during this time between the Force
of Light and the Forces of Darkness. Many
people, sadly, will choose to follow after the
beast and accept his rhetoric against the God of
Creation. The Prophet Daniel describes how he
will arise:
“Thus he said: ‘The fourth beast
will be a fourth kingdom on the earth, which
will be different from all the other
kingdoms and will devour the whole earth and
tread it down and crush it. As for the ten
horns, out of this kingdom ten kings will arise;
and another will arise after them, and he will
be different from the previous ones and will
subdue three kings. He will speak out against
the Most High and wear down the saints of the
Highest One, and he will intend to make
alterations in times and in law; and they will
be given into his hand for a time, times, and
half a time. But the court will sit for
judgment, and his dominion will be taken
away, annihilated and destroyed forever. Then
the sovereignty, the dominion and the greatness
of all the kingdoms under the whole
heaven will be given to the people of the saints
of the Highest One; His kingdom will be
an everlasting kingdom, and all the dominions
will serve and obey Him’” (Daniel 7:23-27).
Specifically, we are told that
the antimessiah/antichrist will have the power
“to change the times and the law” (RSV). It is
important to note that the Aramaic word dat
(tD),
appearing in Daniel 7:25, to be differentiated
from the Torah or Law of Moses (hrAT).
It specifically relates to “state legislation,
public law” or “law as religion” (HALOT).[8]
When Daniel prophesied that the beast would have
the power to change the law, he was referring to
the state laws that would be legislated that
would prevent God’s people from keeping His Law.
One of the principal laws that will be mandated
in the Seventieth Week of Israel by the
worldwide antichrist system will be the
implantation of the mark of the beast:
“He also forced everyone, small
and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to
receive a mark on his right hand or on his
forehead, so that no one could buy or sell
unless he had the mark, which is the name of the
beast or the number of his name” (Revelation
13:16-17, NIV).
This human law
that will be made requires a person to receive
the mark of the beast in order to conduct in
trade and commerce. Those who do not receive the
mark of the beast are killed as traitors to the
state (Revelation 13:15), or what we might call
the antimessiah’s “New World Order.” Receiving
the antimessiah’s “mark” will be considered a
sign of loyalty, if not worship. The
implementation of the mark of the beast is
contrary to God’s Law, as the Torah prohibits a
person from making a tattoo or any kind of
idolatrous etching on his body:
“You shall not make any cuts in
your body for the dead nor make any tattoo marks
on yourselves: I am the
Lord” (Leviticus 19:18).
Traditional Jewish theology has
always advocated, under the premise of
Pikku’ach Nefesh
or “regard for human life,” that any commandment
of the Torah short of committing idolatry can be
broken to save one’s fellow. However, one who
receives the mark of the beast will be
committing idolatry, embracing a physical symbol
on the body that he or she is loyal not to God—but
to Satan. But how is this related to “the
Sabbath”? Consider the blasphemies that the
antimessiah will declare against God, described
by John in Revelation:
“There was given to him a mouth
speaking arrogant words and blasphemies, and
authority to act for forty-two months was given
to him. And he opened his mouth in blasphemies
against God, to blaspheme His name and His
tabernacle, that is, those who dwell in
heaven. It was also given to him to make war
with the saints and to overcome them, and
authority over every tribe and people and tongue
and nation was given to him” (Revelation
13:5-7).
Both Daniel and Revelation speak
of the antichrist who will speak out against God
Almighty, and persecute the saints. The saints
in Revelation are specifically described as
those “who keep the commandments of God and hold
to the testimony of Yeshua” (Revelation 12:17;
14:12). This is a description of Messianic
Believers. Messianic Believers today should
know Messiah Yeshua as their Personal Lord and
Savior, and likewise be striving to obey God by
following the Torah. A critical part of the
Torah is keeping the weekly Sabbath or
Shabbat.
We now arrive at an interesting impasse.
Understanding that Shabbat is indeed a
sign given by God to His people, what will
happen during the Tribulation period? What kind
of rhetoric or blasphemies will be issued by the
antimessiah and his cohort against the God of
Israel and the Torah? Are there not places on
Earth today where it is difficult for many Jews
to follow the Torah? In various European
countries, laws have been passed that prohibit
traditional kosher slaughter of animals,[9]
and impede the practice of infant circumcision.[10]
One day, the Scriptures tell us that people will
be “marked” with some form of physical
identification. Perhaps the answer of how the
mark of the beast and Shabbat may be
connected is more simple than we think.
One of the most critical parts of
keeping the Sabbath is not buying or selling.
Buying or selling on the Sabbath was
definitively prohibited during the time of Ezra
and Nehemiah, when the exiles of the Southern
Kingdom returned from Babylon and experienced
some difficulties with their non-Israelite
neighbors. We are told that, “As for the peoples
of the land who bring wares or any grain on the
sabbath day to sell, we will not buy from them
on the sabbath or a holy day; and we will forego
the crops the seventh year and the
exaction of every debt” (Nehemiah 10:31). The
principal reason in Revelation that people
receive the mark of the beast is to buy and
sell. Receiving the mark of the beast goes
against the principal requirements of keeping
Shabbat: abstaining from work and engaging
in commerce.
The connection between a physical
mark of the beast and Sabbath observance may
come as a result of the blasphemies that the
antimessiah issues against God. It may be
manifested as simply as a statement made by the
antimessiah such as, “We’re going to use our
marks to buy and sell on that ‘God’s Sabbath!’”
coming as a result of seeing Israel being
restored and the 144,000 on the scene. At the
first bowl/vial of God’s wrath (Revelation
13:17), those who have the mark (charagma)
will receive a grievous sore, and they will
physically pay for their foolishness.
What is the connection between
the physical mark of the beast and
non-observance of the Sabbath? While I do not
believe that not keeping the Sabbath is “the
mark of the beast,” I do believe that the
antimessiah can blaspheme God by proclaiming
that those with the mark should buy and sell
profusely on Shabbat, which is forbidden
in Scripture. Why and how the Sabbath observance
issue is brought to the world scene may also be
an interesting phenomenon to follow. Could it
come about because of Israel’s prophesied
end-time ingathering and restoration under the
Messiah?
What happens to those who receive
the mark of the beast?
“Then that lawless one will be
revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath
of His mouth and bring to an end by the
appearance of His coming; that is, the
one whose coming is in accord with the activity
of Satan, with all power and signs and false
wonders, and with all the deception of
wickedness for those who perish, because they
did not receive the love of the truth so as to
be saved. For this reason God will send upon
them a deluding influence so that they will
believe what is false, in order that they all
may be judged who did not believe the truth, but
took pleasure in wickedness” (2 Thessalonians
2:8-12).
The Word of God is very clear
that Satan comes to deceive humanity. We are
told in Revelation 12:9 that “the serpent of old
who is called the devil and Satan…deceives the
whole world.” However, in 2 Thessalonians
2:8-12, the Apostle Paul writes that it is God
Himself who sends unbelievers a “strong
delusion” (KJV) in the Last Days because they
rejected the salvation message available from
believing in Yeshua. Will those under such an
influence be those who accept the mark of the
beast?
What happens to those who receive
the mark of the beast, be it a microchip
implant, organic component, or something
physical we have yet to conceive?
“Then another angel, a third one,
followed them, saying with a loud voice, ‘If
anyone worships the beast and his image, and
receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand,
he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of
God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup
of His anger; and he will be tormented with
fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy
angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the
smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever;
they have no rest day and night, those who
worship the beast and his image, and whoever
receives the mark of his name’” (Revelation
14:9-11).
The Book of Revelation is quite
clear that those who receive the mark of the
beast are destined for eternal punishment in the
Lake of Fire. They secure themselves a place
among the condemned by receiving a physical mark
of their rebellion against and rejection of God.
They get to suffer for eternity along with the
beast whom they worshipped. During the
Tribulation period, before their consignment to
the Lake of Fire “There is no rest day or night”
(NIV) for them. In no uncertain terms, they
suffer the same fate as the antichrist, false
prophet, and Satan himself:
“And the beast was seized, and
with him the false prophet who performed the
signs in his presence, by which he deceived
those who had received the mark of the beast and
those who worshiped his image; these two were
thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns
with brimstone” (Revelation 19:20).
“And the devil who deceived them
was thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone,
where the beast and the false prophet are also;
and they will be tormented day and night forever
and ever” (Revelation 20:10).
The antimessiah, the false
prophet, and Satan will all spend eternity in
the Lake of Fire. All who take the mark of the
beast will suffer the same consequences and they
will have no hope for salvation. We need to pray
for those who might be deceived by the mark of
the beast before it comes (even if we are long
since dead before the Tribulation is upon us),
so that they might have ample enough warning to
reject it and receive the saving power of Yeshua
the Messiah. Likewise, any of us who may live
during this time, or those of future
generations, must be prepared to endure
hardships and persecution for a short season
because of our faith in Yeshua.
A short season of pain and
suffering for the Lord is nothing compared to an
eternity of punishment that awaits those who
take the mark of the beast.
Conclusion
The issue
surrounding the phenomenon called “the mark of
the beast” is perhaps more complex than one
truly realizes. On the surface, it seems as if
it is just something that is physical used for
commerce and identification in the days of the
antichrist. But if one does some further
examination, where common views are sometimes
challenged, one can still see the validity of
the mark of the beast being a physical
implement, but realize that there are more
elements involved which primarily relate to how
we are to be set-apart from the world and
consecrated unto God.
We fully affirm that there will
be a physical mark, etching, marking, or carving
(Grk. charagma) that will be placed on
the followers of antichrist during the
Tribulation period. However, we also believe
that in doing so, the beast will blaspheme
against both God and against His people who are
singled out by observance of His commandments.
In saying this, our salvation does not come by
following His commandments, but it is His
commandments that make us holy unto Him and
set-apart from the sins and evils of this world.
When the antimessiah blasphemes against God’s
people, He will blaspheme against their
obedience to Him.
The study concerning what the
mark of the beast is should be a sobering
thought to us. The Scriptures tell us that those
who take the mark will suffer the horrors of the
Lake of Fire. Yeshua tells us, “false messiahs
and false prophets will appear and produce great
signs and omens, to lead astray, if possible,
even the elect” (Matthew 24:24, NRSV). If any
false messiah or false prophet arises, do we
have the discernment to distinguish between
truth and error? When the false messiah
comes, many, even some among God’s elect, will
be led astray. The only way we can counter this
is by having set-apart lives unto the Lord, and
be in obedience to Him. Furthermore, are we in
prayer for the lost who might take the mark of
the beast and reject God’s salvation?
J.K. McKee (B.A.,
University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN
Online (www.tnnonline.net) and is a Messianic
apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah,
Torah In the Balance, Volume I, and When
Will the Messiah Return?. He has also
written many articles on the Two Houses of
Israel and Biblical theology, and is presently
focusing on Messianic commentaries on various
books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
Applied Digital Solutions Acquires
Rights to World’s First Digital Device
(1999), 15 December, 1999, from <http://biz.yahoo.com>.
[2]
David Whitehouse (1999). Time up for
silicon chips, 23 June, 1999. BBC
News. Retrieved 27 March, 2006, from
<http://news.bbc.co.uk>.
[3]
Consult the editor’s
articles “Is
Sunday ‘the Lord’s Day’?”
and “How
Do We Properly Keep Shabbat?”
for a further discussion of this issue.
[4]
Consult the editor’s
article “When
Did ‘the Church’ Begin?”
for more details.
[5]
Francis Brown, S.R.
Driver, and Charles A. Briggs,
Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English
Lexicon (Oxford: Clarendon Press,
1979), 17.
[6]
H.G. Lidell and R. Scott,
An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), 727.
[7]
Frederick William Danker,
ed., et. al.,
A Greek-English Lexicon
of the New Testament and Other Early
Christian Literature,
third edition (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2000), 1077.
[8]
Ludwig Koehler and Walter
Baumgartner, eds., The Hebrew &
Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament,
2 vols. (Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill,
2001), 2:1856.
[9]
In Switzerland, for
example, traditional kosher slaughter of
animals has been illegal for over a
century. Additional countries that have
made it illegal include Sweden, Norway,
Denmark, and the Netherlands. For a
further discussion, consult the article
“Kosher
Country: America's Jewish Soul” by Rabbi
Daniel Lapin, accessible at <http://www.towardtradition.org>.
[10]
Consult the editor’s
article “Is
Circumcision for Everyone?”
|