: MAIN
: STATEMENT OF FAITH
: ABOUT THE EDITOR
: THEOLOGY ARTICLES
: FAQ
: BIBLE MESSAGES
: BIBLE STUDY
: TORAH READINGS
: HEBREW/GREEK FONTS

: PRODUCTS (OIM)
   : Books
   : Commentaries
   : eBooks
: SUPPORT (OIM)
: THEOLOGICAL
  RESOURCES

: CONTACT US
: COPYRIGHT POLICY

: OUTREACH ISRAEL
: YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Become a fan of Outreach Israel Ministries on Facebook!

Follow OutreachIsrael on Twitter!



POSTED 11 MAY, 2009

What Are "Works of the Law"?

by J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net


 

I remember the first time I ever heard the possibility that “works of the Law” in the Pauline Epistles could be anything other than just keeping the Mosaic Torah. I disregarded it immediately. Why? Because I heard this from someone, who read an article, whose author had read an article in a theological journal, an article that had likely been misinterpreted and misrepresented. Like the game of telephone—one person gave a message, and then it had been passed down to four or five people—sounding nothing like what had originally been said by the Biblical scholar who made the original proposal. Hearing things fourth or fifth-hand can make it pretty easy to disregard what has been said, especially if the person passing on the information is not a part of the theological conversation, who is able to go to the source, seeing what was originally proposed, and engage on any kind of reasonable level.

Anyone who enters into Pauline theology today will easily encounter the fact that there are scholars and exegetes who think that the clause “works of law” or ergōn nomou (ergwn nomou)—appearing first in Galatians (2:16[3x]; 3:2, 5, 10), and then appearing again in Romans (3:20, 28)—actually does designate something other than “works required by the Mosaic Law,” or at least something a bit more specific than just “observing the law” (NIV) in general . These proposals, though, have been met with a great deal of criticism, and even some hostility, by those of particular theological traditions. Alternatives to the customary meaning of “works of law” have been proposed more frequently, as New Testament theologians, over the past fifty years or so, have had greater access to ancient Jewish literature and resources, and this information has had to be considered in their exegesis. Their thoughts, suggestions, and conclusions are just now late in this decade being discussed by normal lay people in the evangelical Church.

Does the Apostle Paul use ergōn nomou as a polemic against Jewish observance of the Torah, against a kind of salvation-by-works doctrine? Or does he use it in reference to something like ancient halachic matters that affected a faith community, which should have been welcoming of non-Jewish Believers in the Messiah, but were not?

Today’s Messianic movement has grown in leaps and bounds significantly because Believers want to know more about the First Century place and setting of the Apostolic Scriptures. While this has certainly affected much of how we view the teaching style of Yeshua the Messiah as a First Century rabbi, it has unfortunately not affected as much of how we view the Pauline letters. The Pauline letters are a part of the Bible that too many of us do not deal with, either because we just do not know what to do with them, or because entering into the world of contemporary Pauline scholarship is too much of a minefield and a hassle for us to do. Too few of our congregational leaders and teachers are aware of the considerable progress that has been made in the past few decades within Pauline theology, and how it opens up parts of Galatians and Romans—that have traditionally been interpreted as being anti-Torah—to really not be anti-Torah at all. They include, rather, specific critiques of practices and attitudes that impeded the work of the gospel among the nations in the First Century.

In this article, we will discuss some of the various proposals made regarding “works of the Law,” and see how they play out. Are “works of the Law” just observing the Mosaic Torah? Are “works of the Law” some kind of legalism? Or, are “works of the Law” the identity barriers set by an ancient sect of Judaism? How might knowing about these things bring greater clarity to passages in Galatians and Romans? What kind of contemporary application might help us to be a vibrant Messianic faith community, which can positively impact society at large?


End of sample excerpt.

Enjoyed this excerpt? Purchase The New Testament Validates Torah
Paperback: $25.99; Amazon Kindle eBook: $9.99


J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net) and is a Messianic apologist. He is a 2009 recipient of the Zondervan Biblical Languages Award for Greek. He is author of numerous books, dealing with a wide range of topics that are important for todays Messianic Believers. He has also written many articles on theological issues, and is presently focusing his attention on Messianic commentaries of various books of the Bible.



Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New American Standard, Updated Edition (NASU),
© 1995, published by The Lockman Foundation.

BACK TO TOP

Click here for more information

Book

$30.00 includes U.S. shipping & handling

 
$9.99 instant download
for Amazon Kindle

Survey of the Apostolic Scriptures (NT)

Book

$20.00 including U.S. shipping & handling


$9.99 instant download
for Amazon Kindle

 

 

 

 


Information on this website is © 1999-2012 TNN Online
 and may not be reproduced without permission.