|

POSTED
12 AUGUST, 2010
One Law for
All
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
Today’s broad Messianic movement has many admirable qualities for
which it should feel most spiritually gratified.[1]
The Messianic movement has been used mightily by
the Lord to see many Jewish people come to
saving faith in Messiah Yeshua (Christ Jesus),
and it has also helped many evangelical
Christians appreciate their Hebraic Roots and
the Torah. The Messianic movement definitely
stands against the common, yet errant thought in
much of modern Christian theology, that the Law
of Moses was exclusively for the era prior to
the Messiah, and has now been nullified with His
arrival.
While it is safe to say that most of the broad Messianic community
believes that God’s Torah is valid instruction
in a general sense, there are varied degrees of
praxis and halachah to be certain. It is
not difficult to find Messianic congregations
which are quite close to following an Orthodox
Jewish level of Torah keeping, others which shun
a great deal of Jewish tradition, and then
others which stand somewhere in the middle. If
there is anything that all congregations or
fellowships have in common, it is that there is
a panoply of different interpretations and
applications of commandments. The order of the
Shabbat service could be very different
from one assembly to another, the way kosher is
kept is probably not going to be the same, and
the way people dress and groom themselves will
certainly not be uniform.
Because of the uniqueness of Messianic congregations, which are
often mixed assemblies of Jewish
and
non-Jewish Believers, a significant discussion
and debate is ongoing about the relevance of
Moses’ Teaching to the broad Body of Messiah.
While it is only natural to expect Messianic
Jews to keep the seventh-day Sabbath or remember
the Passover, being a definite part of their
ethnic heritage, are these practices—and many
others—things that non-Jewish Believers in the
Messianic community should also be expected to
follow? There has certainly been much talk about
what is intended by the Torah’s usage of terms
like “one law” or “one statute” for not only the
native Israelite, but also for some kind of
outsider who has joined into the assembly of
Israel, appearing in passages such as: Exodus
12:48-49; Leviticus 24:22; Numbers 9:14;
15:15-16, 29-30. What does all of this mean?
Sadly, when these verses get mentioned among different Messianic
teachers or leaders, rather than some reasonable
discussion and constructive dialogue occurring,
a great deal of accusations and misstatements
are instead more likely to be made. The amount
of negative emotions present, from all the
various sides regarding the different One Law
verses, has been quite disproportionate to the
actual amount of careful dissection of these
verses. There has been much written about the
One Law subject matter, but most of it has
unfortunately been in the form of refutations
and counter responses to other teachers, with
some territorialism quite easily detected.[2]
While it is difficult at times not to get engulfed in the politics
of our broad Messianic faith community, we must
strive as best as can to remain above them.[3]
We have to act like mature Believers whose
loyalty is to the Scriptures and the legitimate
mission of God, and not a particular
sub-movement or clique. It is most surprising to
me that given the significance or importance
that some have given to these different One Law
passages, that there has been very little
engagement with the actual verses themselves.
There has been an avoidance to attempt to
understand these verses for what they originally
meant to Israel in the context of the Ancient
Near East, their implications to the generation
of the Apostles, and then how they affect us
living today. Furthermore, there has not been a
great deal of evaluation incorporating a
reasonable range of current Biblical
scholarship, including not only Jewish opinions,
but also those of evangelical Christian and
critical/liberal interpreters.
It is my intention in this investigation to provide an analysis for
you of the different One Law verses, engaged
with the Biblical text, the opinions of a
spectrum of respected commentators, and how
their role helps us to understand the trajectory
of Jewish and non-Jewish Believers making up a
“one new humanity” (Ephesians 2:15, NRSV/CJB) in
Messiah Yeshua. Our job as Bible readers and
interpreters is to always go to the text, so we
can see the actual data, and filter out any of
the distracting noise—as noise has a tendency to
just get us upset and offended at each other. In
order for us to have a good handle on what “one
law” really means, we need to make sure that we
have done our homework, and that we are no
longer satisfied with a sub-standard level of
examination.
J.K. McKee
(B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN
Online (www.tnnonline.net) and is a Messianic
apologist.
He is a 2009 recipient of the Zondervan Biblical
Languages Award for Greek.
He
is author of
numerous books, dealing with a wide range of
topics that are important for today’s
Messianic Believers. He has also written many articles on
theological issues,
and is presently focusing his attention on Messianic commentaries
of various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
Important Note:
This article was originally posted to
the TNN Online website 12 August, 2010.
This was three months before another
article, which has the same exact title,
was released:
Toby Janicki.
“One Law for All”
Messiah Journal Issue 105, Fall
2010/5771.
[2]
This information includes, but is not
limited to: Tim Hegg (2003).
Is the
Torah Only for Jews? Torah Resource.
Available online via <http://torahresource.com>;
Daniel Juster and Russ Resnick (2005).
One Law Movements: A Challenge to the
Messianic Jewish Community. Union of
Messianic Jewish Congregations.
Available online via <http://umjc.org>;
Boaz Michael and D. Thomas Lancaster.
“‘One Law’ and the Messianic Gentile”
Messiah Journal Issue 101, Summer
2009/5769; Aaron Eby, Toby Janicki,
Daniel Lancaster, and Boaz Michael.
(2009). Divine Invitation: An
Apostolic Call to Torah. First Fruits of
Zion. Available online via <http://ffoz.org>;
Tim Hegg (2009). An Assessment of the
“Divine Invitation” Teaching. Torah
Resource. Available online via
<http://torahresource.com>; Toby Janicki.
“We are the God-Fearers”
Messiah
Journal Issue 103, Spring 2010/5770;
Rick Spurlock (2010).
Biblical Unity
Versus Divine Invitation Theology.
Bereans Online. Available online via
<http://www.bereansonline.org>; Tim Hegg
(2010). What in a Name? Thoughts on
“One Law.” Torah Resource. Available
online via <http://torahresource.com>.
[3]
Unfortunately in my experience in
interacting with the different sides
(both pro and con) of the One Law issue,
I have encountered very few people who
have yet to really understand N.T.
Wright’s sound word, “there are two ways
of winning a battle. You can do your
best to kill as many enemies as you can
until few if any are left to oppose you.
Or you can simply outflank your
opponents so that they realize their
position is unsustainable” (Justification
[Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2009],
pp 30-31).
He also properly says, “It is really
high time we developed a Christian ethic
of blogging. Bad temper is bad temper
even in the apparent privacy of your own
hard drive, and harsh and unjust words,
when released into the wild, rampage
around and do real damage...[I have] a
pastoral concern for anyone who spends
more than a few minutes a day taking
part in blogsite discussions, especially
when they all use code names: was it for
this that the creator God made human
beings?” (Ibid., pp 26-27). Much of the
debate over the One Law issue has
erupted on various Internet blogs, and
on blogs there is often a dynamic
present of provoking and antagonizing
people to anger. It should go without
saying that this is not a fruit of the
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23).
|