|

REVISED EDITION
POSTED 30 DECEMBER, 2003
Introduction to Things Messianic
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
In studying the Bible, many Christians unfortunately find
themselves only reading the New Testament or the Apostolic
Scriptures. Although these important Scriptures speak of the
gospel message, testify to the works of our Lord Yeshua (Jesus),
and speak of issues that the First Century Believers had to
contend with, these writings comprise less than one-third of the
Bible. Those whose focus is almost exclusively in this part of
the Bible can have an unbalanced approach of our Creator and His
plan for the ages.
Although the
Messianic Scriptures were written in Greek,[1]
their very nature is Hebraic. The man who authored more than
half of these writings was the Apostle Paul, a Rabbinical
scholar who studied under Gamaliel (Acts 22:3; Philippians 3:5),
a revered sage of Judaism to this day (b.Megillah 21a).
Our Messiah Himself was a Hebrew, as are many of His expressions
and sayings. Consider the following examples:
“If your right eye makes you stumble, tear it out and throw it
from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of
your body, than for your whole body to be thrown into hell”
(Matthew 5:29).
“The eye is the lamp of the body; so then if your eye is clear,
your whole body will be full of light. But if your eye is bad,
your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light that
is in you is darkness, how great is the darkness!” (Matthew
6:22-23).
The above quotations are just two examples of the Hebraic nature
of our Savior’s teachings. In theological studies they are
generally referred to as Hebraisms or Semitisms in the Biblical
text. For centuries, scholars have debated verses such as those
above. Many have been confused. Do they require such a literal
viewpoint that demands a physical “plucking out of eyes”? Not at
all. To a First Century Jew, the eye can mean more than just an
organ with which one sees. It can be a person’s mind, emotions,
will, or good sense, depending on the context. There can be a
very deep meaning to Yeshua’s statements when one understands
that there is an Hebraic nature behind them. This is where the
Messianic movement steps in and where a First Century Jewish
perspective of the Scriptures is crucial.
Although the Messianic movement is composed of people from many
theological traditions: largely Conservative and Reform Judaism,
and evangelical Christianity, the emphasis concerning the
Hebraic Roots of our faith in the Messiah is very important
concerning the times in which we live. Several decades ago, if
one uttered the name “Yeshua,” very few would have known who, or
for that matter what, the person was talking about. However,
many Christians today are aware of the fact that Yeshua ([Wvy)
is the original Hebrew name of the Messiah. Why has this come
about?
Because many now realize the fact that
understanding the Hebraic Roots of our faith is important.
Why is it important to understand the distinctive Hebraic Roots
of our relationship with God? Yeshua the Messiah is returning to
Jerusalem and the gates of the New Jerusalem are named after the
Twelve Tribes of Israel (Revelation 21:10-12). The Apostle Paul
himself says that if you are in the Messiah, you are a part of
the Commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:11-12). Our faith is
undeniably connected to Israel and to the Jewish people, because
after all it did start as a sect of Second Temple Judaism.
Knowing about the origins of our faith is imperative if we are
to return to truly having an “Apostolic” theology.
Knowing about “things Messianic” and distinctively Hebraic, is
the first step toward new enrichment of our faith from Genesis
to Revelation. By understanding the Hebraic origins of our
faith, many of the obscure parts of the Apostolic Scriptures
(New Testament) begin to become clear and take on a new depth,
as we consider their background and the lifestyle practices of
the first Believers in Yeshua.
“The Church” (Ekklēsia)
Many Christians believe that “the Church” started at Pentecost
following Yeshua’s ascension into Heaven. They believe that “the
Church” is a group of chosen ones separate from Israel, and
perhaps that it is not important to really study the Tanach or
Old Testament because it does not directly apply to “the
Church.” The Biblical truth is that the called out body of God’s
chosen existed long before this time.
The word
“church” never appears in the Greek texts of Scripture. The word
commonly translated as such comes from ekklēsia (ekklhsia).
LS defines ekklēsia as “an assembly of the
citizens regularly summoned, the legislative assembly” and
“in N.T. the Church, either the body, or the place.”[2]
In the Apostolic Scriptures ekklēsia is used as a term to
define the Body of Messiah, and thus by extension, is rendered
as “church” in most English translations of the New Testament.
TDNT remarks that “Since the NT uses a single term,
translations should also try to do so, but this raises the
question whether ‘church’ or ‘congregation’ is always suitable,
especially in view of the OT use for Israel and the underlying
Hebrew and Aramaic…‘Assembly,’ then, is perhaps the best single
term, particularly as it has both a congregate and an abstract
sense, i.e., for the assembling as well as the assembly.”[3]
This Christian commentary says that “assembly” would be the
best, consistent translation for the word ekklēsia.
The Septuagint,
or ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, frequently
translates the Hebrew word qahal (lhq),
or assembly/congregation, as ekklēsia. Qahal is
the Hebrew word for “assembly” or “congregation” used in the
Tanach, which almost exclusively refers to Israel. TWOT
tells us, “usually qāhāl is translated as ekklēsia
in the LXX.”[4]
When the Apostolic writers used the Greek word ekklēsia,
often rendered as “church” in our English Bibles, they did not
see the ekklēsia as a separate assembly or group of
people away from Israel. They considered the ekklēsia to
be Israel. It is not surprising by any means that one of the
definitions given for the word ekklēsia does in fact
include “Israel.” Thayer states that “in the Sept. [ekklēsia
is] often equiv. to
lhq,
the assembly of the Israelites.”[5]
It is unfortunate that ekklēsia in most Bibles has been
translated as “church,” whereas it would be best rendered as
either “assembly” or “congregation.”[6]
It is important to know that the ekklēsia or assembly of
elect has always existed. The Holy Spirit being poured out at
Pentecost, was a fulfillment of prophecy, recorded in both the
Tanach (Old Testament) and the Apostolic Scriptures (New
Testament). But the events that occurred on this day did not
start a “new group of elect.” Pentecost, in actuality Shavuot
(tA[bv)
or the Feast of Weeks—one of the Biblical festivals specified in
Leviticus 23—is one of the commanded times of ingathering in the
Torah or Law of Moses (Deuteronomy 16:16). The Apostle Peter
attested that what occurred when the Holy Spirit was poured out
was a fulfillment of prophecy:
“[B]ut this is what was spoken of through the prophet Joel: ‘And it shall be in the last days,’ God says, ‘That I will pour forth
of My spirit on all mankind; and your sons and your daughters
shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your
old men shall dream dreams; even on My bondslaves, both men and
women, I will in those days pour forth of My spirit and they
shall prophesy. And I will grant wonders in the sky above and
signs on the earth below, blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke.
The sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood,
before the great and glorious day of the Lord shall come. And it
shall be that everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be
saved’” (Acts 2:16-21; cf. Joel 4:26).
The events at Pentecost/Shavuot were foretold in Joel
3:1-4:
“It will come about after this that I will pour out My Spirit on
all mankind; and your sons and daughters will prophesy, your old
men will dream dreams, your young men will see visions. Even on
the male and female servants I will pour out My Spirit in those
days. I will display wonders in the sky and on the earth, blood,
fire and columns of smoke. The sun will be turned into darkness
and the moon into blood before the great and awesome day of the
Lord comes.”
So did the
ekklēsia, or assembly of “called out ones,” begin at
Pentecost/Shavuot? All the Scripture records is that
there was a fulfillment of prophecies in Joel that will be fully
completed in the Last Days. Interestingly enough, the martyr
Stephen tells us that “the Church” actually existed at Mount
Sinai. In the KJV, he is recorded as saying, “This is that
Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall
the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto
me; him shall ye hear. This is he, that was in
the church in the wilderness[7]
with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with
our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto
us” (Acts 7:37-38). The so-called “Church Age” did not begin in
30 C.E. Yeshua the Messiah only speaks of this age and the age
to come (Matthew 12:32, 13:49; Mark 10:30; Luke 18:30), meaning
the future Messianic Kingdom.
In reference to
the Hebraic Roots of our faith, it is important to remember that
the Apostles and the early Believers in the Messiah were not
foreign to the Hebrew Bible. Numerous references to “the
Scriptures” in the Apostolic Writings (New Testament) are
referring to the Torah, Nevi’im,
and Ketuvim—or the Law, the Prophets, and
the Writings: the Tanach/Tanakh ($nt).
The Gospels, Epistles, and many of the other Messianic Writings
had yet to be canonized or even written when “the Scriptures”
were referred to or appealed to by the Apostles.[8]
As we have previously mentioned, Paul was a Rabbinical scholar
fluent in the Tanach, and when witnessing to fellow Jews in the
Synagogue he would have tried to show them how Yeshua fulfilled
the prophecies and prophetic patterns seen of His life from the
Hebrew Bible. Acts 17:2 records how it was Paul’s custom to
reason with his Jewish brethren on the Sabbath, proving to them
from the Scriptures that Yeshua was the Messiah: “And according
to Paul's custom, he went to them, and for three Sabbaths
reasoned with them from the Scriptures.”
It is also
important to note that prior to 70 C.E., the year the Romans
destroyed Jerusalem, “Christianity” was a legal religion in the
Roman Empire as Rome considered it to be a sect of Judaism which
was exempt from worshipping Caesar. However, as the
Hebrew-Greek Key Study Bible explains, “Jewish Christians
(Messianic believers) were considered to be a sect (Acts 24:5)
of Judaism. But, after A.D. 70, all Christians were on their
own; they were recognized as separate from Judaism.”[9]
After that time, the assembly of Believers steadily distanced
itself from its Hebraic Roots. Much of this was created by Roman
anti-Semitism, and was coupled by the Synagogue authorities
ejecting Believers in Yeshua.
What we know today as “Christianity” originated from First
Century Judaism and has changed tremendously since then. Our
faith in Yeshua the Messiah (Jesus Christ) at its very core is
Hebraic. The Messiah, Yeshua, is an Israelite and is the Lion of
the Tribe of Judah (Revelation 5:4-5). He is coming to reign
from Jerusalem, not Rome as some Catholics might believe or Salt
Lake City as Mormons may espouse.
So why should we study the roots of our faith? You cannot have a
house without a foundation. The foundations of the ekklēsia
pre-Pentecost are definitively Hebraic. It is crucial to
understand the world view that Yeshua, the Apostles, and the
early Believers in the Messiah had so we can more fully
understand Scripture as it was originally composed: God-inspired
from an Hebraic world view.
The Jerusalem Council
In the very early days of the community of Believers following
Pentecost or Shavuot, the vast majority of the Believers
were Jewish. Later, however, the gospel message began to spread
beyond the borders of the Land of Israel. Israel, of course, was
to be a light to the nations, and God’s conduit by which He
would save the world. Israel’s Kingdom could only be restored by
the whole world knowing about the greatness of Israel’s God, and
its Messiah, Yeshua.
As many God-fearing non-Jews came to faith in the Messiah things
changed substantially. There was debate among the Jewish
Believers whether these non-Jews had to “convert to Judaism,” be
circumcised, and then receive the Messiah (Acts 15:4), or
whether they could receive Him directly and then grow in their
faith. It caused a great stir as many believed that circumcision
and observance of the Torah or Law of Moses had to precede the
salvation experience. Acts 15 records the decisions made by the
Jerusalem Council as the goyim (~yAG)
or ethnē (eqnh),
“the nations,” were coming to faith in the Messiah:
“The apostles and the elders came together to look into this
matter. After there had been much debate, Peter stood up and
said to them, ‘Brethren, you know that in the early days God
made a choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles would
hear the word of the gospel and believe. And God, who knows the
heart, testified to them giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He
also did to us; and He made no distinction between us and them,
cleansing their hearts by faith. Now therefore why do you put
God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke
which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?’” (Acts
15:6-10).
Before the Council issued its ruling, Peter restates what has
occurred. In Acts 10:9-16, the apostle is shown the vision of
the sheet with animals on it considered unclean by the Torah’s
standards. Peter is told three times to “Get up, Peter, kill and
eat!” (Acts 10:13), and he responds with, “No, Lord; for I have
never eaten anything that is common or unclean” (Acts 10:14,
RSV). This passage is usually interpreted as meaning that God
annulled the dietary requirements of the Torah or Law of Moses.
However, Peter himself gives the appropriate interpretation of
his vision that has nothing to do with meat:
“And he said to them, ‘You yourselves know how unlawful it is
for a man who is a Jew to associate with a foreigner or to visit
him; and yet God has shown me that I should not call any
man unholy or unclean’”
(Acts 10:28).[10]
In Acts 15:6-11, Peter tells us that the nations have been made
clean by the blood of the Messiah, can receive the same Holy
Spirit, and must come to faith the same way as Jewish Believers.
He also emphasizes that “a yoke…which…our fathers nor we were
able to bear” (Acts 15:10, NIV) should not be put upon them,
implying that legalistic or mandatory observance of the
Law of Moses involving circumcision for salvation was not
necessary. This is what the Jerusalem Council ruled, which was
led by James the Just, half-brother of Yeshua:
“Therefore it is my judgment that we do not trouble those who
are turning to God from among the Gentiles, but that we write to
them that they abstain from things contaminated by idols and
from fornication and from what is strangled and from blood. For
Moses from ancient generations has in every city those who
preach him, since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath”
(Acts 15:19-21).
Four requirements were given to the new non-Jewish believers in
order for them to congregate with Jewish Believers in the
Messiah:
1.
Abstinence from pollutions of idols
2.
Abstinence from fornication
3.
Abstinence from things strangled
4.
Abstinence from blood
Briefly summarized, Believers from the nations were to avoid
idols, fornication (sexual immorality), meats that were not
butchered in a proper method (Deuteronomy 14:2-20), and from
blood (Deuteronomy 12:23-25).
Why were the non-Jews coming to faith told to observe these four
things?
“For Moses from ancient generations has in every city those who
preach him, since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath”
(Acts 15:21).
The inference is that born again non-Jews were to observe these
things so that they could enter the synagogues to be taught
torah (hrAT)
or the Instruction of God as delivered through the five books of
Moses (also commonly called the Pentateuch).
In Ephesians 2:11-16, the Apostle Paul writes that non-Jews who
come to faith in Yeshua have been made a part of the
Commonwealth of Israel:
“Therefore remember that formerly you, the Gentiles in the
flesh, who are called ‘Uncircumcision’ by the so-called
‘Circumcision,’ which is performed in the flesh by human
hands—remember that you were at that time separate from
Messiah, excluded from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers
to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in
the world. But now in Messiah Yeshua you who formerly were far
off have been brought near by the blood of Messiah. For He
Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and
broke down the barrier of the dividing wall, by abolishing in
His flesh the enmity, which is the Law of commandments
contained in [dogma], so that in Himself He might make the
two into one new man, thus establishing peace, and might
reconcile them both in one body to God through the cross, by it
having put to death the enmity.”
He tells us that those who were “separate from Messiah” were
“alienated from the commonwealth of Israel” (Ephesians 2:12,
RSV), but that through the sacrifice of the Messiah He will make
the two into “one new humanity” (Ephesians 2:15, NRSV).
Ephesians 2:15 tells us that “God through the cross… put to
death the enmity,” or sin which has been atoned for through the
sacrifice of the Messiah which once separated God the Father
from mankind. All Believers in Yeshua are a part of the
Commonwealth of Israel.
Believers from the nations were, however, warned by the Apostle
Paul not to boast against the Jewish people or the natural
branches. The Jewish people have been preserved by God as the
remnant of Israel since the dispersion of the Northern Kingdom
of Israel in 721-722 B.C.E. As Paul attests, “do not be arrogant
toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that
it is not you who supports the root, but the root
supports you. You will say then, ‘Branches were broken off
so that I might be grafted in.’ Quite right, they were broken
off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be
conceited, but fear; for if God did not spare the natural
branches, He will not spare you, either” (Romans 11:18-21). No
one is to boast against the Jewish people, because if God can
break off natural branches from Israel’s olive tree to save wild
branches of the nations, He can certainly break off the wild
branches.
The roots of our faith come from Israel and ultimately Yeshua,
the Root of all Israel. Non-Jewish Believers who have been
separate from Israel have nothing to boast about (Romans
11:17-22), but need to respect those who hold the oracles of God
(Romans 3:2). The Jerusalem Council ruled that there is no
difference between Believers of different ethnic backgrounds as
all are a part of the same Israel. From that Israel comes our
Divine Savior, the Messiah Yeshua.
Roman Catholicism Takes Its Toll
What we have described concerning the Jerusalem Council is
somewhat different than what is often taught in mainstream
Christianity. True born again Believers are a part of Israel. It
is important to note that there is no reference in Scripture
that the First Century Believers dispensed with the Torah or Law
of Moses, including the seventh-day Sabbath, the appointed times
of Leviticus 23, and the kosher dietary laws. Rather, in the
Apostolic Scriptures (New Testament) it is made clear that
legalistic observance of the Torah via a conversion to Judaism
was not a salvation requirement and that no person would gain
salvation by keeping commandments.
But if the First Century ekklēsia was very Hebraic, how
did we get to where we are today? Presumably, these Believers
did not celebrate mainstream Christian practices such as “Sunday
church” or the holidays of Christmas and Easter as we currently
know them.
History records
that following the First Council of Nicea in 325 C.E., the
institutional Church began passing legislation prohibiting the
keeping of the Sabbath and the Biblical festivals. This is an
indication that even up until the Fourth Century there were some
Believers that were keeping, or at least nominally keeping,
these practices. When “Christianity” was made a legal religion
in the Roman Empire by Constantine, syncretism was largely
practiced by the clergy, meaning Biblical concepts were often
merged with pagan customs. It ultimately resulted in the
widescale merger of Church authority with political authority
and the Roman Catholic Church we now largely know today was
formed as a consequence.[11]
Following the fall of Rome in 476 C.E. to the Visigoths, the
Dark Ages began. During this period, Europe experienced one of
the worst times in human history, which the Roman Catholic
Church dominated. One risked death by simply possessing a
written copy of the Holy Scriptures, and disease and plague were
rampant. Europeans were also some of the most uneducated people
in the known world (especially when compared to Jews and
Muslims) as the Roman Catholics held most Biblical, historical,
and philosophical documents solely in their possession. Of
everything that was taught and believed, the most dangerous was
that the Catholic Church held that eternal life or salvation
only came through participation in its sacraments. The pope was
believed to have the authority on Earth to give people exemption
from Divine punishment, or condemn them eternally.
The Reformation
We truly believe that the Reformation, which began in the early
1500s, was an act of God. German monk Martin Luther could not
reconcile the Biblical concept of “the just shall live by faith”
with the Roman Catholic teaching of salvation via the Church’s
sacraments. History records that his Ninety-Five Theses or
protests against the Catholic Church began the phenomenon we now
call the Protestant Reformation. From that point onward men and
women of God began to read their Bibles and question Roman
Catholic tradition.
The two primary goals of the Reformers were (1) to purge the
Church of non-Biblical Roman Catholic practices, and (2) to
present the general populace a copy of the Scriptures in their
native languages. During this time famous English translations
such as the 1599 Geneva Bible and 1611 King James Bible were
produced. The Biblical realization that salvation came by grace
through faith alone and not by works of the Roman Catholic
Church was also reestablished. Certainly, the Reformers did not
agree on everything, and many different Protestant sects did
arise. But, had it not been for what they did, we would
certainly not be where we are today.
When we review the current Messianic movement, one must realize
that the Reformation accomplished much, although there are still
areas of Biblical theology that need to be reformed. The
Reformation showed us that the practices of Roman Catholic
ritual confession, praying to the saints, Mary veneration or
worship, and belief in purgatory, were non-Biblical. A few in
the Messianic movement believe the Protestant Reformation was a
failure because Protestants still observe some Roman Catholic
practices. However, would we be better off if the Reformation
had not occurred? Are we not building upon the theology of those
who have gone before us—both Jewish rabbis and Christian
theologians?
What has the Messianic movement today achieved?
The Messianic movement today was started by Jews who were
Believers in the Messiah Yeshua as an evangelistic outreach to
fellow Jews. Many of today’s Messianic congregations, however,
have a mixed group of constituents, including Jews who have
received Yeshua as the Messiah, and others from Christian
backgrounds wanting to enrich their faith. Overall, the
Messianic movement has been responsible for awakening many
Christians to the truly Hebraic origins of their faith.
There are, however, distinctive differences between your average
Messianic congregation and your standard church setting. Just as
there are many types of Christian churches, there are a wide
variety of Messianic congregations.
One of the most obvious differences between a Messianic
congregation and your average church is that Messianics
typically assemble or hold services on a Friday night or
Saturday in observance of the Biblical Sabbath or Shabbat.
Depending on what region of the world in which you live, a
congregation can be very much like an Orthodox Jewish synagogue,
or similar to a standard church setting, with all the variance
you can imagine in between. Use of traditional Hebrew liturgy is
also not uncommon in Messianic settings. Some are more
charismatic than others, and some are highly reserved. Again,
depending on where you are and what congregation you are
attending can affect the degree of “Jewishness.”
The Messianic movement has been responsible for awakening many
Believers to the Hebraic Roots of the faith, and continues to
grow larger and larger every year. It is a signal that the
return of the Messiah is drawing closer, as many are being
convicted that they need to return to the practices and
lifestyle of the First Century saints.
Yeshua the Messiah (Jesus Christ) is returning to Jerusalem. He
prophesied that His twelve Disciples would “sit upon twelve
thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel” (Matthew 19:28).
He tells us in Matthew 25:34-46 that we will be judged for how
we treat His Jewish brethren. Yeshua adamantly states that those
who treat the Jewish people badly or with malice shall go “into
everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels”
(Matthew 25:41, KJV). Isaiah 2:3 tells us that during the
Millennium “from Zion the law will come forth, and the word of
the Lord from
Jerusalem.” Is it important to understand Israel and the Hebraic
Roots of our faith? Absolutely!
Each Believer’s goal should be to be as Biblically sound as
humanly possible, Genesis-Revelation—and not just
Matthew-Revelation. Understanding the origins and roots of the
relationship with our God, the Holy One of Israel, is a crucial
part of attaining this goal. May you seek a firm foundation as
you grow in your faith and examine His Word for answers!
J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A. Student, Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net)
and is a Messianic apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah, Torah In the
Balance, Volume I, and When Will the Messiah Return?.
He has also written many articles on the Two Houses of Israel
and Biblical theology, and is presently focusing on Messianic
commentaries on various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
There is the belief among some in the Messianic movement
that the Apostolic Scriptures were written in Hebrew.
This belief, however, is not based in historical fact.
Consult the publication
Scripture Under Scrutiny: Was the
New Testament Really Written In Hebrew?
available from TNN Press.
[2]
H.G. Lidell and R. Scott, An
Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1994), 239.
[3]
K.L. Schmidt, “ekklēsía,” in
Geoffrey W. Bromiley, ed., Theological Dictionary of
the New Testament, abrid. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1985), 397.
[4]
Jack P. Lewis, “qāhāl,” in R. Laird
Harris, Gleason L. Archer, Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke,
eds., Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament
(Chicago: Moody Press, 1980), 2:790.
[5]
Joseph H. Thayer, Thayer’s
Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Peabody,
MA: Hendrickson, 2003), 196.
[6]
Two Christian translations that render
ekklēsia as “assembly” include Young’s Literal
Translation and the Literal Translation of the Holy
Bible by Jay P. Green.
[7]
Grk. tē ekklēsia en tē erēmō (th
ekklhsia en th erhmw).
[8]
Acts 17:2; 11; 18:24, 28; Romans 15:4;
16:26; 1 Corinthians 15:3; 4.
[9]
Spiros Zodhiates, ed., Hebrew-Greek
Key Study Bible, NASB (Chattanooga: AMG Publishers,
1994), 1548.
[10]
The Mishnah says in m.Ohalot 18:7,
“Dwelling places of gentiles [in the Land of Israel] are
unclean,” and as such Jews in the Second Temple period
did not often voluntarily associate themselves with
others. The Greek word athemitos (aqemitoß)
used in Acts 10:28, in most Bibles rendered as
“unlawful,” does not mean unlawful in the sense of
something against the Torah. It pertains, rather, “to
not being sanctioned, not allowed, forbidden”
(Frederick
William Danker, ed., et. al.,
A Greek-English Lexicon of the New
Testament and Other Early Christian Literature,
third edition [Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
2000], 850), relating to custom or opinion, as opposed
to something that is Biblical law.
[11]
For a further and more detailed
discussion, consult Chapter 2 of the author’s book
Torah in the Balance, Volume I,
“Maintaining Balance in Our Quest into the Torah.”
|