|

POSTED 25 SEPTEMBER, 2001
Have We Been "Made Dead" to the Truths of God's Word?
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
None of us will
forget the tragic events of September 11, 2001 as the twin
towers of the World Trade Center in New York were destroyed with
two hijacked 767s, and the Pentagon was crippled with a hijacked
757, by Al-Qaida terrorists. As President George W. Bush rightly
told Congress concerning international terrorism and its
perpetrators, “Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring
justice to our enemies, justice will be done.”[1]
As the Torah readily tells us, “Moreover, you shall not take
ransom for the life of a murderer who is guilty of death, but he
shall surely be put to death” (Numbers 35:31). We are
furthermore told in Revelation 21:8, “But for the cowardly and
unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and
sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be
in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the
second death.” This means that all the Hitlers and Stalins and
terrorists of the world will not be a part of God’s Eternal
Kingdom. You will seldom find a Bible-believing Christian today
who will disagree with these Biblically-mandated principles:
those responsible for global terrorism should be hunted down and
dealt with, so that people can be safe.
There are
Christians today who disagree with the death penalty, and some
of them hold to forms of liberal theology concerning what “sin”
is. Those of us who are more conservative with what we believe
Scripture tells us, are generally of the conviction that the
basic premise of the “death penalty” has been instilled for
humans living on Earth: murderers and terrorists in a society
are to be brought to justice and rooted out by execution. It is
the most extreme penalty that can be afflicted on a person in
the physical world.[2]
But what of
other Scriptural matters that too have been instilled for God’s
people, such as the seventh-day Sabbath or Shabbat, the
appointed times of Leviticus 23, the dietary laws, indeed—even
the whole of the Torah? Did not the Lord tells us that His Torah
was olam (~l[),
meaning “eternity; remotest time; perpetuity” (Nelson)?[3]
Indeed, King David sang in Psalm 119:142, “Your
righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and Your law
truth.”
Just as many Believers are rightfully seeking to enforce the
death penalty on terrorists who will murder people in cold
blood—why are many of the same unwilling to see some of the
other principles of Biblical instruction enforced
on themselves?
This article addresses a very controversial issue for many of
today’s Christians who have been told that they are “free from
the Law.” Many in the religious community today believe they are
now “free” in some manner or another to go and violate God’s
eternal principles. We will address some of the subjects that
arise when Messianic Believers readily defend the Torah’s
eternal validity: Do Christians understand the Torah of Moses?
Do Christians know how the Torah is applied in the Apostolic
Scriptures or New Testament? Can Christians claiming to have
knowledge of the Torah properly apply it in the writings of the
Apostle Paul, so commonly used to refute Messianic beliefs?
All too
often, we as Messianic Believers unfortunately do not
systematically respond to the antinomian arguments that may come
from mainstream Christianity. Instead, many of us get caught up
in negative emotions and claim that Christians who tell us we
have put ourselves “under a yoke” or “burden,” are “lawless,”
rather than examining their claims—and hence we usually defeat
our purpose of defending the validity of our Heavenly Father’s
Instruction. We now seek to change this misconception.
Do Christians really understand the Torah?
It is unfortunate that when many Christians come against those
of us who are “Torah observant,” or more specifically believe
that we should obey some of the “finer points” of Scripture such
as the seventh-day Sabbath, the Biblical holidays, and the
dietary laws, things that Messiah Yeshua did, that
many of these same Christians do not know what they are coming
against—because they have never really
studied the Torah.
In this category, we do not include knowing about Biblical
stories that any Believer should be familiar with. We all know
about Noah and the Flood, Joseph’s coat of many colors, and the
Ancient Israelites’ Exodus from Egypt—accounts many of us were
taught in Sunday school. We are talking about the specifics of
the 613 mitzvot (twcm)
or commandments contained in the Torah. We are talking about
having a specific knowledge about what God decreed for His
people to keep them holy unto Him and set-apart from the world.
Indeed, as stated in Deuteronomy 7:6, “For you are a holy people
to the Lord your
God; the Lord your
God has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of
all the peoples who are on the face of the earth” (cf. 1 Peter
2:9; Titus 2:14).
Ignorance of the Torah’s commandments is quite commonplace in
today’s Christianity. A strident example of this occurs when a
Messianic Believer may tell a person that he or she eats
“Biblically kosher.” Very few Christians have read enough of the
Torah of Moses to even know what this means. They might know
that it includes abstaining from things such as pork (Leviticus
11:7; Deuteronomy 14:8), but not that it also means abstaining
from shellfish such as crab, lobsters, clams, and oysters
(Leviticus 11:9-12; Deuteronomy 14:9-10). Furthermore, many of
the same Christians readily conclude that being “Biblically
kosher” includes things such as not mixing milk and meat, having
two sets of regular dishes, eating gefilte fish, and other
practices that are commonly associated with today’s Orthodox
Judaism.
Certainly, I am
not against those practices that have helped solidify Jewish
identity throughout the centuries, although many of them may be
based more on Rabbinical rulings and certain interpretations of
Scripture. The problem with many Christians is that they believe
that Orthodox Judaism today is a carbon copy of the Judaism that
Yeshua was part of in the First Century, which it is not.
(Likewise, the “Christianity” of today is not like the religion
of the early Believers.) Many of the same readily forget that
the Messiah had problems with some of the extra-Biblical
practices that were adhered to in His time, which resulted in
hypocrisy for many (Matthew 23).[4]
There is an old saying: know your enemy. In other words, before
you come against something, know what you are coming against. Do
not fly blind or attack something that you know little or
nothing about. Unfortunately, this is the case for many
Christians who attack the veracity of the Torah. They do not
know what they are attacking, and they should be ashamed of what
they are doing. If they truly realized it, the same Christians
who are coming against what we as Messianic Believers stand
for—are coming against the very heart and soul of our
faith—which is that our loving Heavenly Father gave His Divine
Instruction to His children by which we are to live. But, since
many Christians do not regularly read the Torah, and in many
cases may have never read it, they do not know how the Torah is
applied in the words of Yeshua and when Paul discusses the
intricacies of the Law.
For insight into some of the most seriously overlooked
Scriptures in our Bible, we highly recommend that you follow the
yearly Torah-reading cycle every week. In synagogues worldwide a
particular portion or parashah of the Torah, usually a
few chapters of Scripture, is read and discussed so that after a
year you have read through it in its entirety.
The Torah in the Apostolic Scriptures
A fundamental problem exists today among many Christians,
especially in their dealings with us as Messianic Believers.
Although we should always remember that we serve the same God,
the God of Israel, and know the same Savior, Yeshua the Messiah
(Jesus Christ) as our Redeemer—we do have differences in regard
to the character of our Heavenly Father. Many of your average
Christians will not come out and say “I do not believe that the
Law of Moses does not serve a purpose,” but rather in their walk
with the Lord it is obvious that they want to do as little as
possible in regard to obedience. We would also emphasize,
whether realizing it or not, that many of these same people have
a convoluted view of Divine “love” as I have had some actually
tell me, “We do not feel obligated to observe commandments that
are not evident of grace and love,” forgetting the entire
purpose of the Torah altogether. It is thought that only
some of God’s commandments actually
came from God!
In order for us to have an appropriate understanding of the
Torah of Moses, we must first realize that love and grace,
concepts that many Christians readily take for granted, have
always been characteristics of God. Love and grace existed
in the wilderness when the Lord formally gave the commandments
to Moses; they did not “begin” at the cross. Yeshua is “the Lamb
slain from the foundation of the world” (Revelation 13:8, KJV),
meaning that grace was present in the wilderness and during the
Exodus. Why did God not destroy the Ancient Israelites when they
disobeyed Him in the desert (cf. Exodus 32:9-14)? Was it because
of strict “law,” or because of His grace and mercy?
Of course, many Christians eagerly quote Matthew 22:36-40 as
“proof” that they “obey the Law”:
“‘Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?’ And He
said to him, ‘“You shall
love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your
soul, and with all your mind.” This is the great and
foremost commandment. The second is like it, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” On these two
commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.’”
The problem with viewing these commandments in a strict “New
Testament” context is that these principles are resonated
throughout the Torah. Consider Deuteronomy 6:4-9 and Leviticus
19:18, which Yeshua was directly repeating:
“Hear, O Israel! The Lord
is our God, the Lord
is one! You shall love the
Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul
and with all your might. These words, which I am commanding you
today, shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently
to your sons and shall talk of them when you sit in your house
and when you walk by the way and when you lie down and when you
rise up. You shall bind them as a sign on your hand and they
shall be as frontals on your forehead. You shall write them on
the doorposts of your house and on your gates” (Deuteronomy
6:4-9).
“You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the
sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as
yourself; I am the
Lord” (Leviticus 19:18).
If we believe that these Torah principles stand as Yeshua
readily affirmed the validity of the Torah in His words,
actions, and deeds (Matthew 5:17-19), then what of the so-called
“negative” Torah principles that Christians today frequently
discard? Do they not understand that by keeping our Father’s
commandments that His love for us is evidenced in them? Do they
not understand that God’s commandments are for our benefit as
safeguards?
We Messianic Believers are also readily quoted John 13:34 by
many Christians: “A new commandment I give to you, that you love
one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one
another.”
Certainly, none of us should disagree with this clear admonition
from our Lord. Indeed, He told us to agapaō (agapaw)
one another, that agapē (agaph)
love being so powerful that “Greater love [agapē]
has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his
friends” (John 15:13). But the Apostle John also writes, “By
this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God
and observe His commandments. For this is the love of God, that
we keep His commandments; and His commandments are not
burdensome” (1 John 5:2-3). And Deuteronomy 11:1 tells us, “You
shall therefore love the
Lord your God, and always keep His charge, His statutes,
His ordinances, and His commandments.”
An important point we would like to make note of in John 13:34
is the understanding of “new” in this verse. Obviously, the
admonition to love one another was in the Torah and was not
“entirely new,” but most Bibles render the Greek kainos (kainoß)
as “new” and many readers get that impression.
The Concise
Greek-English Dictionary of the New Testament by Barclay M.
Newman gives us some varied meanings of kainos,
including, “new; of new quality; unused; unknown, unheard of.”[5]
It has been validly argued that some in Yeshua’s time did not
emphasize many of the “heart commandments” of the Torah and
instead focused on outward observances, forgetting basic Torah
principles such as love, grace, and respect. First Century
Israel had been under the occupation of the Romans, and with the
exception of a brief period of independence under the Maccabees,
the Jewish people had been dominated by foreign powers since the
Babylonian dispersion. It would have been very easy for people
to forget to love others, especially those outside the community
of Israel. The commandment to love could have easily gone
“unused.”
The
characteristics of love and grace do not negate safeguards that
our Heavenly Father wants us to be aware of and follow. Just as
the Ancient Israelites were, so can we be set-apart from the
world in which we live and be holy unto Him by obeying the
Torah, and even by obeying those “finer points” that much of
Christianity has cast aside or ignored.
Once Again, There is No “Church”
The most common refutation that is directed toward many
Messianics concerning obedience to the Torah is very simply: “We
are not Jewish and we do not feel that those laws apply to us.”
If we were to look at it another way, this is really no
different than the argument that many Christians use which says,
“Jesus was speaking to the Jews in this passage, so it doesn’t
apply to me.” If that is our logic when following the Messiah’s
words, before long you do not have very much that applies to
“you” in terms of either written Scripture or God’s revelation.
It should be
emphasized that a great deal of today’s evangelical Christian
doctrine is contingent on the presupposition that God has two
groups of elect or chosen ones: Israel and “the Church.” The
so-called “Church” is considered to compose all those who have
put their faith in the Messiah from Shavuot/Pentecost to
the present, and likewise Israel is considered to be the Jewish
people. But let us reemphasize one thing—very clearly—Israel
was divided into the Two Houses of Judah and Israel/Ephraim, two
Kingdoms that split after the reign of King Solomon. These two
groups of people—and those from the nations—will be
reunited as a single people of Israel before Yeshua returns in
fulfillment of Bible prophecy.[6]
Israel is not solely composed of the Jewish people, so it is
incorrect to say that Israel is “all Jews” and those of us who
are not Jewish should not obey so-called “Jewish mitzvot.”
All of God’s commandments are for all of God’s people.
It is correct to say that there are commandments for all
Israel in Scripture, those that apply to all of God’s
children. Born again Believers in Messiah Yeshua are a part
of the community of Israel (Ephesians 2:11-12). For as the Torah
says, “These are the commandments which the
Lord commanded
Moses for the sons of Israel at Mount Sinai” (Leviticus 27:34).
But what of the
entity that is commonly called “the Church”? To put it candidly:
it simply does not exist. There is no reference in
Scripture to our Heavenly Father ever making a covenant with an
entity known as “the Church,” but there are numerous references
in Scripture to Him making a covenant with the people of Israel.[7]
The concept of “the Church” as a second group of elect is
unbiblical and is contrived on only a few passages such as
Matthew 16:18, when Yeshua supposedly tells Peter that on
Himself He will “build My church.” However, the Greek verb
oikodomeō (oikodomew)
could just as well be translated “rebuild” or “restore,” a
direct reference to the Messiah’s reestablishing the divided
Kingdom of Israel as Jeremiah 33:7 translated from the
Septuagint, or ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible,
reads, “I will turn the captivity of Juda, and the captivity of
Israel, and will build [oikodomeō] them, even as before”
(LXE). Translated from the Hebrew verb banah (hnB)
for “build,” Jeremiah 33:7 reads, “I will restore the fortunes
of Judah and the fortunes of Israel and will rebuild [banah]
them as they were at first” (NASU).
The
understanding of “Church” as it is understood among many
Christians today is based on an inaccurate rendering of the
Greek term ekklēsia (ekklhsia),
which more properly means “assembly,” as ekklēsia is
employed in the LXX to refer to Israel in many passages to
translate the Hebrew term qahal (lhq).[8]
This usage of ekklēsia, without question, was known by
the Apostolic writers when they wrote under the inspiration of
the Holy Spirit in reference to the people of Israel, not “the
Church.”[9]
Our understanding of what assembly of chosen ones we as born
again Believers are part of, is best understood when the Apostle
Paul tells us we are a part of “the commonwealth of Israel”
(Ephesians 2:11-12). This should end any confusion of “the
Church” being a viable entity of elect outside those who are
born again and part of the ekklēsia of Israel.[10]
But what of the principles that govern Israel? Have they been
dispensed with? If as Believers we are a part of Israel as
opposed to “the Church,” are we not then obligated to obey God’s
Torah? The answer is a clear: Yes!
In this hour many of us believe that the Lord has begun to
restore all Israel. He says that in the end, “My servant David
will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd; and
they will walk in My ordinances and keep My statutes and observe
them” (Ezekiel 37:24). We are told that when all Israel is
united that they all will be keeping the Torah.
Some Christians have heard and nominally accepted the message of
all Israel being reunited, but the issue of “Torah observance”
continues to be a pitfall for many. Many Christians will even
eagerly consider themselves to perhaps be a part of returning
Israel that has been scattered into the nations, and eagerly
desire to be united with the Jewish people. At the very least,
they consider themselves to be a part of Israel or connected to
Israel in some way. But many of the same are unfortunately
unwilling to take that responsibility seriously—not realizing
that most Jewish people reject Jesus as Messiah because of
“Christian” (mis)handling of the Torah. Our Jewish brethren are
not impressed by what they see, by-and-large in practice, of a
Messiah that came to “do away” with—or even “fulfill and thus
abolish”—the Torah of Moses.
By not keeping the Torah, non-Jewish Believers have not been
provoking Jews to jealousy for faith in Yeshua (cf. Romans
11:11) and are hindering the Messiah from returning. Why?
Because only when Judah sees returning Israel doing what “he
does”—according to the prophecies—obeying the Torah, coupled
with faith in Yeshua, will he be compelled to want such
satisfaction and hence be open to the gospel. If we are all
serious about living a life like the Messiah’s—we will follow
the Torah! Only then can any of us fulfill the
mandate to provoke Jews to jealousy.
Isaiah 8:14 tells us concerning Yeshua, “Then He shall become a
sanctuary; but to both the houses of Israel, a stone to strike
and a rock to stumble over, and a snare and a trap for
the inhabitants of Jerusalem.”
Both Jews and Christians generally have their own diluted views
of the Messiah: one as a First Century heretic, and the other as
one whose job it was to abrogate the “Old Testament Law.” Among
many “Christians” who believe they should “honor the Law” is the
false idea that we can “pick-and-choose” what to follow. In
other words, we can follow the “moral commandments” but not the
“ceremonial commandments.” But the character of God suggests
otherwise, and the “pick-and-choose” method employed is flawed.[11]
The Lord told Ancient Israel in Deuteronomy 25:13-14, “You shall
not have in your bag differing weights, a large and a small. You
shall not have in your house differing measures, a large and a
small” (cf. Leviticus 19:36; Proverbs 20:10, 23).
Has this basic premise changed? Does the Lord tolerate differing
weights and measures? No. God says “For I, the
Lord, do not
change” (Malachi 3:6). God does not have a double standard, but
man does. “For My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your
ways My ways” (Isaiah 55:8). Human beings might think it
necessary to sift through what they like and do not like in the
Torah, or what is applicable to “the Church,” but Biblically we
do not have that luxury. We must take the entire Scriptures and
the entire Torah as being for the Believer. This
includes the keeping of the seventh-day Sabbath or Shabbat,
the appointed times, and the dietary laws, among other things.
A Proper Understanding of Romans 7:1-7
In the previous sections, we have laid the appropriate
groundwork for understanding the context of Romans 7:1-7. When
we interpret this Scripture passage, we must emphasize its Torah
background. If we do not have a basis in the Torah’s
commandments, we can have a tendency to misinterpret the Apostle
Paul’s words.
As we
have detailed before, it is our position as a ministry that the
Torah or the Law of Moses is applicable for Believers today. We
do not believe that it was “nailed to the cross” or “done away
with” as many Christians believe. We do emphasize, however, that
holding the Torah in a perspective consistent with the life and
teachings of Yeshua is very important, as He is the Word made
flesh and it is by His interpretation we follow it. The Messiah
kept the Sabbath, the Biblical festivals, and the dietary laws,
just to name a few things. Any objective, historical examination
of the Gospels will reveal this.
But what about the Apostle Paul, the writings of whom so many
use to support a denial of the Torah? What is he saying when
Believers “have been released from the Law, having died to that
by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the
Spirit and not in oldness of the letter” (Romans 7:6)? Is Paul
saying that it was the Torah itself that bound us and that we
have been released from it by no longer being obligated to obey
it? As we observed earlier, there are eternal principles in the
Torah—such as love and grace and mercy—which we are
commanded by God to have for one another. Just as many cast
aside truths that the Messianic movement has been fortunate
enough to revive, such as the Biblical holidays and Sabbath, are
we expected to likewise cast aside love and grace? Surely not.
We now provide appropriate commentary of Romans 7:1-7, analyzing
what Paul is really telling us what we have been released
from:
“Or do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those who
know the law), that the law has jurisdiction over a person as
long as he lives? For the married woman is bound by law to her
husband while he is living; but if her husband dies, she is
released from the law concerning the husband. So then, if while
her husband is living she is joined to another man, she shall be
called an adulteress; but if her husband dies, she is free from
the law, so that she is not an adulteress though she is joined
to another man” (Romans 7:1-3).
In the first part of this passage Paul compares the position of
the Believer to the married woman who “is legally bound to her
husband while he lives” (HCSB). The Greek text says dedetai
nomō (dedetai
nomw),
lacking the definite object, which could very well mean that it
is speaking of only a specific instruction and not the Torah in
its entirety. The NASU does not capitalize “law,” reflecting an
interpretation that something more generic, or perhaps even more
specific, is being referred to. YLT renders this as, “for the
married woman to the living husband hath been bound by law.”
The Greek verb
translated “bound” is deō (dew)
meaning, “to bind, i.e., put under obligation” (Thayer).[12]
Paul later goes on and tells us that while the husband is living
she is obligated to observe this instruction. If during their
marriage she violates this “law” she is considered to be
practicing infidelity, but if he dies and she remarries, she is
not considered unfaithful.
The critical admonition here, that so many Christians miss, is
how Torah commandments are relating to what Paul is saying.
There are regulations in the Torah that specifically relate to
marriage and are hence only applicable to married people. They
are not applicable to those who are unmarried or who are
widowed. For example, Leviticus 18:19 tells us “you shall not
approach a woman to uncover her nakedness during her menstrual
impurity.”
What this means is that during a woman’s time of menstruation,
no sexual contact is to occur with her husband. Obviously, if a
woman is widowed as Romans 7:1-3 is speaking of, a woman is no
longer applicable to the commandment to abstain from intercourse
with her husband, because she is no longer married and can no
longer have sexual relations with her husband. Paul writes, “if
her husband dies she is discharged from the law concerning the
husband” (Romans 7:2, RSV).[13]
If during her marriage the woman violates her marriage covenant
by having an affair with another man, she has violated the Law.
But, if she joins with another man after her first husband dies,
just as she joined with her first husband, she has broken no
commandment. By properly understanding the intricacies of the
Torah, we can now understand what Paul is telling us:
“Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law
through the body of Messiah, so that you might be joined to
another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we
might bear fruit for God” (Romans 7:4).
So often theologians read Romans 7:4 forgetting its Torah
background. Paul is not saying that we have been made dead to
the entirety of the Torah through the sacrifice of Yeshua. What
did the Messiah come and die for? Did He die to do away with the
Torah of Moses? No, because He said “truly I say to you, until
heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke
shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished” (Matthew
5:18; cf. Luke 16:17). The married woman in Romans 7:1-3 was not
removed from the entirety of the Torah and its moral standards
simply because her husband died. What happened, rather, was that
a particular part of the Torah—the instruction concerning
marriage—was made non-applicable to her.
Yeshua has freed us as Believers from a particular aspect from
the Torah. Paul writes in Galatians 3:13, “The Messiah redeemed
us from the curse pronounced in the Torah by becoming
cursed on our behalf” (CJB). Yeshua’s death, burial, and
resurrection did not free us from the entirety of the Law of
Moses and its standard of God’s holiness; He freed us from its
death penalty pronounced upon sinners. Because born again
Believers are covered by His shed blood, we are no longer taken
out and executed for our violation of the commandments.
And as a result, we will not experience the judgment of the Lake
of Fire and be eternally separated from God. But even though our
sin is covered, we certainly should not seek to disobey our
Heavenly Father.
This is how we as Believers have “died to the Law.”
We have not died to the eternal truths
exemplified in God’s Word established in the Torah such as
justice, grace, mercy, and love.
This understanding is now perfectly evident when we read Romans
7:5-6:
“For while we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were
aroused by the Law, were at work in the members of our
body to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from
the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we
serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the
letter.”
Before we became Believers, repented of our sin, received Yeshua
into our lives, and had His blood covering, we continually
violated the Torah and were fully applicable to its penalties.
But as blood-washed born again Believers with the Holy Spirit,
we have been released from that state and now serve the Lord “in
newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.”
This second verse has been under much scrutiny as many have a
false understanding of the “oldness of the letter.” The NIV
translates this as “we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and
not in the old way of the written code.” Many Christians readily
conclude that this “written code” (also translated as such in
RSV, NRSV, and ESV) spoken of contains the commandments of the
Law of Moses. But, how do we obey God if we do not follow this
so-called “written code” and instead obey Him in what we might
call the vague “new way of the Spirit”? The Apostle John had
some very strong words by stating, “The one who says, ‘I have
come to know Him,’ and does not keep His commandments, is a
liar, and the truth is not in him” (1 John 2:4). One who claims
to honor the Torah “in the Spirit,” but does not attempt to
even do it in the physical, is, according to John, speaking
falsehoods.
Some Bibles
have provided an inaccurate rendering of the original Greek text
that is not literal. Paul was not speaking of the “written
code,” but rather the gramma (gramma)—very
clearly the “letter.”[14]
If our lives are solely concentrated on the written letter of
the Torah, without Yeshua’s atoning work, then certainly our
observance is in vain and we will misapply its instruction. Our
fleshly desires will be aroused and we may find ourselves
applicable to the Torah’s penalties. But with the Holy Spirit
and Yeshua’s example guiding us, then we can truly be in the
will of our Heavenly Father.
Anyone can follow the Torah in its strictest sense without
Yeshua, but still be going straight to Hell. Indeed, our Messiah
told some Pharisees, “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which on the
outside appear beautiful, but inside they are full of dead men's
bones and all uncleanness” (Matthew 23:27). It is one thing to
keep the Torah in the natural, but it is another thing to be
following it with the empowerment of the Holy Spirit.
We now arrive at the apex of this critical text:
“What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the
contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the
Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had
not said, ‘You shall not
covet’” (Romans 7:7).
In this verse the Apostle Paul very clearly emphasizes that the
Torah is not sin, but is in fact something that is to
reveal the sin in one’s life, resulting in a person crying out
for salvation. He does not say that keeping the Law of Moses is
“sin,” as so many Messianic Believers can be told by their
Christian colleagues. We are, rather, following the Biblical
examples given to us by the lives of Yeshua, Paul, and the other
Apostles—and hopefully for us, we are guided by the Spirit of
God and not by “outward observances.” Hopefully, we have each
experienced the new birth inside of us so that we might not be
keeping rote “rules and regulations”—but rather our Heavenly
Father’s safeguards for our well-being.
Have we been “made dead” to the truths of God’s
Word?
In this article, we have established that many of the concepts
that Christians only perceive as being revealed in the “New
Testament,” such as love and grace and mercy, were in fact
established in the Torah. We have also established that, as a
part of Israel, born again Believers should be keeping the
Torah. If all Israel is to be reunited in the Messiah, and
Jewish people are to be provoked to jealousy and truly see
Yeshua for who He is—upholding the Father’s Instruction—then we
all need to keep it ourselves. Foremost above all, if we have
been “made dead to the Law” in that it is no longer applicable
today, does that mean that we are dead to eternal truths and
principles established in the Torah? Does this mean we are no
longer to be the upright, moral, just, loving, and grace-filled
people as the Torah admonishes us to be?
Messianic Believers have often been misrepresented in the
Christian world concerning our position of Torah validity,
because so many Christians do not know what the Torah says about
these things. They do not know what they are “attacking” and
what they truly have been made “dead to.” Born again Believers
have been freed from the Torah’s death penalty and its ultimate
consequence, which is eternal damnation. We have not been
“freed” from the truths of God’s Word established in Genesis,
Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. We are not free to
go out and become lawless persons who have no high and holy
standard of living. The Lord admonishes us in the Torah to know
that He is full of love and grace, and so are we to be in our
dealings with other people:
“Know therefore that the
Lord your God, He is God, the faithful God, who keeps His
covenant and His lovingkindness to a thousandth generation with
those who love Him and keep His commandments” (Deuteronomy 7:9).
J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A. Student, Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net)
and is a Messianic apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah, Torah In the
Balance, Volume I, and When Will the Messiah Return?.
He has also written many articles on the Two Houses of Israel
and Biblical theology, and is presently focusing on Messianic
commentaries on various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
“President Declares ‘Freedom at War from Fear,’”
transcript of speech by President George W. Bush
delivered to Congress 20 September, 2001 <whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html>.
[2]
Note that while the death penalty is
something seen in Scripture, it is not something that
should be haphazardly used. Simply executing people for
the sake of executing people is not intended by the
Biblical commands to punish perpetrators of certain high
crimes.
[3]
Merill F. Unger and William White,
Nelson’s Expository Dictionary of the Old Testament
(Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1980), 72.
There is a plethora of references
throughout the pages of the Bible telling us that the
Torah is “everlasting” or “for all generations” (Exodus
27:21; 28:43; 29:28; 30:21; 31:17; Leviticus 6:18, 22;
7:34, 36; 10:9, 15; 17:7; 23:14, 21, 41; 24:3; Numbers
10:8; 15:15; 18:8, 11, 19, 23; 19:10; Deuteronomy 5:19;
Psalm 119:160).
[4]
This is certainly not to say that many of
the added fast days, liturgical prayers, or other
observances of First Century Judaism were “wrong” in the
least, just that the legalistic honoring of them as on
the level of Scripture was and still is. Likewise, we
see similar hostility prevalent today in mainstream
Christianity when Messianic Believers refuse to honor
things that were added by Roman Catholicism and
were not fully purged from Protestantism.
Furthermore, we must consider the
diversity of modern Judaism itself between the three
major branches of Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform
Judaism. One can live a traditionally Jewish life
without having to be “Orthodox.”
[5]
Barclay M. Newman, A Concise
Greek-English Dictionary of the New Testament
(Stuttgart: Deutche Bibelgesellschaft/United Bible
Societies, 1971), 90.
[6]
Isaiah 11:14; Jeremiah 3:18, 30:3; and
Zechariah 10:7, 10.
[7]
Genesis 17; Exodus 6:4-5; 19:5; 24:8;
31:6; 34:10, 27-28; Leviticus 26:9, 42, 45; Deuteronomy
4:31; 5:2; 7:2; 8:18; 9:9, 11, 15; 29:1, 9, 21, 25;
31:16; Joshua 7:11; Judges 2:1; 1 Kings 8:9, 21; 19:14;
1 Chronicles 16:15-17; 2 Chronicles 5:10; 6:11; Jeremiah
10:11; Luke 1:72.
[8]
Cf. Jack P. Lewis, “qāhāl,” in R. Laird
Harris, Gleason L. Archer, Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke,
eds., Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament,
2 vols (Chicago: Moody Press, 1980), 2:790.
[9]
Cf. K.L. Schmidt, “ekklēsía,” in
Geoffrey W. Bromiley, ed., International Standard
Bible Encyclopedia, 4 vols. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1988), pp 397-402.
[10]
For a further study, consult the editor’s
article “When
Did ‘the Church’ Begin?”
[11]
Of course, I do not mean to disparage
Christian theologians who place a high emphasis on the
so-called “moral law” of God, as they do recognize the
validity of at least some of the Torah. It is only to
say that the frequent division of God’s commandments
among moral, civil, and ceremonial is artificial.
[12]
Joseph H. Thayer,
Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament
(Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2003),
131.
[13]
The Greek specifically says that she is
released apo tou nomou tou andros (apo
tou nomou tou androß),
with the entire clause tou nomou tou andros
appearing in the genitive case (indicating indirect
object). “The law of the husband” must be understood as
a part of the Torah, not the Torah as a whole.
[14]
More specifically palaiotēti grammatos
(palaiothti
grammatoß).
|