|


Zechariah,
Book of:
What can you tell me about the composition of
the Book of Zechariah?
Zechariah, just like Haggai, was
a post-exilic prophet and one of his
contemporaries (Ezra 5:1; 6:14), and it should
not be surprising that there are parallels
between the two books that bear their names.
Zechariah returned to the Land of Israel with
the exiles from Babylon, and succeeded Iddo, his
grandfather, as head of a priestly family (1:1,
7; cf. Nehemiah 12:10-16). Zechariah’s name
(Heb. Zekaryah,
hyrkz)
means “the
Lord remembers,” and many extrapolate
this as relating to God’s covenant faithfulness
demonstrated in the text that bears his name.
The Book of Zechariah, though, unlike Haggai,
forms a much broader period of time. Zechariah
is the longest of the Minor Prophets.
Conservatives generally hold to
some kind of unity for the Book of Zechariah,
following Jewish tradition which has
historically held to a unified composition.
Zechariah first prophesied shortly after Haggai
(1:1-6), which was followed by several prophetic
visions (1:7-6:15). It is significant that two
dates are given in the text of Zechariah: the
second year of Darius Hystaspis (1:1, 7), and
the fourth year of his reign (7:1). This places
at least part of the Book of Zechariah in
520-518 B.C.E. (Dillard and Longman, 429), even
though it is most likely that Zechariah’s
prophetic ministry continued. It is notable that
there are a few conservatives who, while not
necessarily being against the unity of
Zechariah, would make note of the differences
between the “first section” (chs. 1-8) and the
“second section” (chs. 9-14) of the text
(Harrison, 954-956). They would still argue that
it is most important that interpreters look at
the final form of the text to draw conclusions.
Liberals make a stark divide in
the Book of Zecharaiah, breaking the text
between chs. 1-8 and chs. 9-14, classifying them
as “Proto-Zechariah” and “Deutero-Zechariah.” It
is argued that chs. 1-8 depict the immediate
future of the Jewish community, and chs. 9-14
depicts the future, indicating that these are
from two different prophets (IDB,
4:944-947; Harrison, 951-954; ABD,
6:1061-1064). It is proposed that chs. 1-8 and
chs. 9-14 are of different literary genres,
employing different imagery, thus requiring
different authors; some early propositions
attributed chs. 9-14 to Jeremiah (EXP,
7:596). Liberals are not agreed among themselves
whether chs. 9-14 actually make up a unity, or
could be divided further (Harrison, 950).
Liberals are forced to conclude that
“Deutero-Zechariah” was anonymous (EDB,
1413).
One of the main propositions for
chs. 9-14 coming from a different prophet or
source is often argued on the basis that “Javan”
or Greece (9:13) is presented as a power in the
Ancient Near East, not Persia, thus
“necessitating” chs. 9-14 as being composed
sometime in the 100s B.C.E. Concurrent with this
is the idea that chs. 9-14 explains the rise of
Alexander of the Great and the military actions
of the Maccabees. This late dating of chs. 9-14
assumes that Greece was not any kind of power or
unknown by the 500s, which cannot be sustained
in comparison with other Tanach passages (Isaiah
66:19; Ezekiel 27:13, 19; cf. Harrison, 952-953;
EXP, 7:597).
There is no evidence in tradition
that chs. 9-14 were ever considered separate
from the text of chs. 1-8 (NBCR, 787).
Conservatives do recognize the difference in
style between chs. 1-8 and chs. 9-14, but do not
believe that this requires two different
“Zechariahs” (NIDB, 1083-1084). There are
even those who believe in the division of Proto-
and Deutero-Zechariah who must say, “It has to
be admitted that none of [our] reasons offers
conclusive proof that Zechariah should be
divided into…sections” (ECB, 721). Many
conservatives believe that the differences in
the Book of Zechariah proposed by liberals are
artificial (Dillard and Longman, 430-431).
No major difficulties exist with
the Hebrew text of Zechariah (ISBE,
4:1185), even though the Greek LXX may offer a
better reading in some places (Harrison,
956-957).
The events of Zechariah are set
in the early years of Darius I (522-486 B.C.E.),
also covered in Ezra 5-6. The chief purpose of
Zechariah was to rebuke the returned Jews to
rebuild the Temple (4:8-10). If the people would
return to the Lord, then He would return to them
(1:7-6:8). The people of Judah needed to be
riveted out of their procrastination, and give
themselves wholly to the purpose of rebuilding
their community and Temple.
A theme seen throughout Zechariah
is that God is true to His covenant promises.
Jerusalem is depicted as playing a crucial role
in the future of God’s Kingdom. Zechariah takes
on Messianic significance, depicting a coming
One who will defeat the enemies of Israel
(9:9-17; 14:1-21). Israel’s restoration would
include the regathering of His scattered people
(10:1-11:3), with God’s ultimate victory over
those who reject Him (12:1-9) as the world
recognizes His universal kingship (2:13; 6:1-8;
14:16-21).
Many of the themes in Zechariah
are applied directly to Yeshua the Messiah and
His ministry (Mark 14:27 and Zechariah 13:7;
Matthew 27:9 and Zechariah 11:12-13; John 19:37
and Zechariah 12:10; John 12:15 and Zechariah
9:9; cf. Dillard and Longman, 436). Some
consider Zechariah to be among the most
Messianic texts in all of the Tanach (EXP,
7:599). Other themes seen in Zechariah are
expanded upon in the Book of Revelation (NBCR,
788; ISBE, 4:1186), and are directly
applied to Yeshua as being the One who defeats
Israel’s enemies and comes to reign over the
whole world.
In the Jewish tradition,
Zechariah 14:9 is used in the Aleinu
prayer, Zechariah 14:1-12 is the Haftarah used
for the first day of Sukkot, and
Zechariah 2:14-4:7 is read on the first Sabbath
of Chanukah and the Haftarah for
B’ha’lotecha (Numbers 8:1-12:16; cf.
Jewish Study Bible, 1250).
Zechariah is an encouraging book
for the downhearted, who believe that God has
left them or that their actions are indifferent.
There is some limited Messianic engagement with
Zechariah, but most often only with its
prophecies pertaining to the Last Days. The
overall message of Zechariah of shaking God’s
people out of their laziness, is not something
widely emphasized in today’s Messianic
community. Zechariah, just like Haggai, could
definitely be a text to inspire us to make the
progress that God desires us to make.
Bibliography
Barabas, Steven. “Zechariah, Book of,” in
NIDB, pp 1083-1084.
Barker, Kenneth L. “Zechariah,” in EXP,
7:595-697.
ben Zvi, Ehud. “Zechariah,” in Jewish Study
Bible, pp 1249-1267.
Dillard, Raymond B., and Tremper Longman III.
“Zechariah,” in An Introduction to the Old
Testament, pp 427-436.
Fensham, F.C. “Zechariah, Book of,” in ISBE,
4:1183-1186.
Hanson, P.D. “Zechariah, Book of,” in IDBSup,
pp 982-983.
Harrison, R.K. “The Book of Zechariah,” in
Introduction to the Old Testament, pp
949-957.
Higginson, R.E. “Zechariah,” in NBCR, pp
786-803.
Meyers Carol, and Eric Meyers. “Zechariah 1-8,”
in ABD, 6:1061-1065.
Meyers, Eric. “Zechariah,” in New
Interpreter’s Study Bible, pp 1337-1350.
Neil, W. “Zechariah, Book of,” in IDB,
4:943-947.
Petersen, David L. “Zechariah 9-14,” in ABD,
6:1065-1068.
Redditt, Paul L. “Zechariah, Book of,” in EDB,
pp 1412-1413.
Rogerson, John W. “Zechariah,” in ECB, pp
721-729.
posted 09 November, 2007
Zephaniah,
Book of:
What can you tell me about the composition of
the Book of Zephaniah?
The Prophet Zephaniah was likely
a person of considerable social status in Judah,
as indicated by his ancestry (1:1), which
designates him a fourth generation descendant of
King Hezekiah (Dillard and Longman, 415). The
meaning of Zephaniah’s name (Heb. Tzefanyah,
hynpc)
is disputed, with some favoring “the
Lord
has hidden,” and others “watchman for the
Lord”
(EXP, 7:537). Zephaniah demonstrates some
knowledge of the political climate of the
Southern Kingdom, and the prophetic works of
Isaiah and Amos. Compared to Micah, whose
prophecies focus on the plight of the common
people of Judah, Zephaniah focuses his attention
in more distinguished circles. Zephaniah could
have known about a young Jeremiah.
Zephaniah prophesied during the
reign of Josiah (640-609 B.C.E.), making him
contemporary to Jeremiah, Nahum, and possibly
Habakkuk, either just before or sometime during
the Josianic reforms (Harrison, 940). Some find
evidence that the Josianic reforms were already
underway (ISBE, 4:1189; Dillard and
Longman, 416) because of the reference to “the
remnant of Baal” (1:4) and various allusions to
the Book of Deuteronomy (1:13; cf. Deuteronomy
28:30; 1:17; cf. Deuteronomy 28:29). The Book of
Zephaniah is the last pre-exilic text.
Conservatives hold to some kind
of unity for the composition of Zephaniah,
noting that “all of Zephaniah is intelligible as
spoken in Josiah’s reign” (ISBE, 4:1189).
It is possible, though, that some references to
“the scattered ones” (2:7, 9: 3:10, 19) are
post-exilic redactions, but nothing so as to
dismiss a core of the text originating from
Zephaniah.
Liberals have largely doubted
some kind of unified authorship or composition
of Zephaniah, arguing that sections of Zephaniah
were written in the post-monarchic period,
specifically 3:9-20. There are liberal trends,
however, which indicate that some are willing to
designate the salvific sections(s) as not
being later additions (IDBSup, 984;
EDB, 1416), and more liberals are leaning
toward a greater part of Zephaniah being
authentic to the prophet (ABD, 6:1078).
The Hebrew MT of Zephaniah is in
good condition, even though consultation of the
Greek LXX is helpful with some passages
(Harrison, 943; ABD, 6:1078).
The Prophet Zephaniah announced
God’s judgment upon the people of Judah. His
words are given against a probable backdrop of
the Scythian invasion of Assyria, as Josiah’s
reforms could be enacted without significant
Assyrian reprisal (Harrison, 940) as a declining
power (IDBSup, 984). A major focus of
Zephaniah is the Day of the
Lord
when God will severely punish both the nations (ch.
2) and Judah (Dillard and Longman, 419). In
spite of God’s judgment, God is also merciful
and will restore His people in the end (ch. 3).
The Josianic reforms were only
temporary, as the people of Judah would fall
back into their previous sinful patterns. Many
of the prominent families of Judah would
participate in worship of the Queen of Heaven (2
Kings 23:11; IDB, 4:951). Zephaniah
indicts the people of Judah for this idolatry
(1:1-2:3), and then indicts the nations who
influenced Judah (2:4-15). A key thrust of
Zephaniah is God’s holiness and His grace (ISBE,
4:1190).
Allusions to Zephaniah and his
message are seen in various places in the
Apostolic Scriptures (ISBE, 4:1191),
certainly affecting some of the eschatological
expectations of the Apostles (Dillard and
Longman, 420), as particularly seen in
Revelation (EDB, 1417). More modern
engagement with Zephaniah largely takes the text
to relate “to contemporary institutions, calling
upon the authorities to make sweeping and
effective reforms lest the judgment threatened
by Zephaniah befall the present government” (ISBE,
4:1191).
There has currently been no
significant Messianic engagement with the Book
of Zephaniah.
Bibliography
ben Zvi, Ehud. “Zephaniah,” in New
Interpreter’s Study Bible, pp 1327-1332.
___________. “Zephaniah,” in Jewish Study
Bible, pp 1234-1242.
Carson, John T. “Zephaniah,” in NBCR, pp
773-780.
Dillard, Raymond B., and Tremper Longman III.
“Zephaniah,” in An Introduction to the Old
Testament, pp 415-420.
Fensham, F.C. “Zephaniah, Book of,” in IDBSup,
pp 983-984.
Gelston, Anthony. “Zephaniah,” in ECB, pp
715-717.
Harrison, R.K. “The Book of Zephaniah,” in
Introduction to the Old Testament, pp
939-943.
King, Greg A. “Zephaniah, Book of,” in EDB,
pp 1416-1417.
Kselman, John S. “Zephaniah, Book of,” in ABD,
6:1077-1080.
Leslie, E.A. “Zephaniah, Book of,” in IDB,
4:951-95.3.
McComiskey, Thomas Edward. “Zephaniah, Book of,”
in NIDB, p 1085.
Schneider, D.A. “Zephaniah, Book of,” in ISBE,
4:1189-1191.
Walker, Larry Lee. “Zephaniah,” in EXP,
7:537-565.
posted 02 October, 2007 |