|


False
Prophecy Predictions:
I have encountered some teachers who have made
false predictions on the end-times and have not
been held accountable. What should I do about
this?
Yeshua the Messiah prophesies in
His Olivet Discourse, “Many false prophets will
arise and will mislead many” (Matthew 24:11).
This has obviously been going on for a very,
very long time and will certainly not stop
anytime soon. Church history is full of figures
over several millennia who have made predictions
on the end-times and the return of the Lord that
have not come to pass. What we may experience
today about certain people claiming that “Date
X” is the time that Yeshua will return, or that
any number of events will take place—and then
they do not occur—is not something that is new.
We should not be surprised when a prediction is
made that does not come to pass.
The Torah tells us quite clearly,
“When a prophet speaks in the name of the
Lord,
if the thing does not come about or come true,
that is the thing which the
Lord
has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it
presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him”
(Deuteronomy 18:22). This means that if someone
makes a false prophecy prediction—and insists
that this is something that God has
revealed—that we should no longer listen to this
person about anything. This proves that the
so-called “prophet” or “man of insight” was not
speaking in the authority of God, and at best
was speaking in his own authority. We have the
responsibility to avoid people who have made
false prophecy predictions. While they can be
forgiven of their error, they should not be
allowed to be in a position expositing upon the
Scriptures as those who
make false prophecy predictions are likely to do
so again, if not repeatedly.
posted 16 October, 2006
Final
Generation:
Do you believe we are the final generation?
It is commonly asserted among many Messianic
Believers, and for that matter many evangelical
Christians also, that our generation living
today is the “final generation.” This is often
based on the following statement by Yeshua
delivered during His Olivet Discourse on the
end-times:
“Truly
I say to you, this generation will not pass away
until all these things take place”
(Matthew 24:34; cf. Mark 13:30; Luke 21:32).
A common claim that is made—especially in some
distinct Messianic circles—is that the “final
generation” started in 1967 with the recapturing
of the Old City of Jerusalem by Israeli forces.
Given that the Exodus generation died out in
forty years (Numbers 32:13; Psalm 95:10), it is
assumed that within a period of about forty
years that the end-times and Second Coming must
be upon us. Today in 2007, this has spurred on a
great deal of end-time speculation and
prognostication, with many claiming that the
world as we know it is coming to an end at
breakneck speed. Certain teachers have taken
advantage of the paranoia, and have capitalized
upon it in more ways than just drawing attention
to themselves.
Interestingly enough, there are three major
interpretations of Yeshua’s words that exist:
1.
The Lord says “this generation will not pass
away,” and is referring to the generation
that lived during the time that He declared
these words. Preterists who believe that the
“end-times” actually took place during the
First Century, and consider the antichrist
of Revelation to be Nero Caesar, are the
most common advocates of this view.
2. The Lord says “this generation will
not pass away,” and is speaking of a future
group of people that will be those who will
witnesses all of the events prior to His
return. While it is easy to associate “this
generation” with those who have witnessed
the rebirth of Israel in the Middle East,
there is no Scriptural indication to
specifically pinpoint when “this generation”
actually began. Yeshua’s two-verse parable
of the fig tree is hardly enough to equate
the reestablishment of Israel as being the
catalyst that began the final generation
(Matthew 24:32-33; Mark 13:28-29; Luke
21:29-30), especially when Israel in
Scripture is associated with the olive tree.
3. When the Lord refers to what the
Greek records as hē genea autē (h
genea auth),
which in most Bibles is rendered as “this
generation,” He is referring to something
else. As should be noted,
genea has a
variety of possible renderings, including “race,
stock, family”
and “a race, generation” (LS).[a]
Yeshua’s words need not be interpreted
regarding a specific “generation” that He
either spoke to in the past, or is speaking
to in the future, but rather an ethnic group
of people that will have survived long
enough into the future to be present to
experience the end-times.
Of the three options considered,
the editor
is convinced that the third—that Yeshua is
actually referring to “this race will not
pass away”—is most valid. The
Ryrie Study
Bible actually confirms these conclusions,
remarking, “No one living when Jesus spoke these
words lived to see ‘all these things’ come to
pass. However, the Greek word can mean ‘race’ or
‘family,’ which makes good sense here; i.e., the
Jewish race will be preserved, in spite of
terrible persecution, until the Lord comes.”[b]
While many Messianics today believe that they
are the “final generation,” it seems very
unlikely that Yeshua will be able to return soon
given the current theological state of the
Messianic movement in 2007. For a movement that
often believes it has the answers to “change the
world” (especially with a message of Torah
restoration)—yet still largely does not even
have a basic theology about God (among other
things)—much is going to have to improve.
Likewise, if today’s Messianic movement truly
did believe it were living in the “final
generation,” then we would see far more
attention dedicated to not only spreading the
good news and seeing that people repent of their
sins, but we would also be preparing people
physically—and more importantly
psychologically—for the effects of the Great
Tribulation.
It seems that the arguments in favor of us
living in the “final generation” are delivered
more to draw attention to various “prophetic”
ministries and sell products, than realistically
developing a well reasoned eschatology. We
should not try to force God’s hand regarding the
fulfillment of prophecy, but rather do all that
we can do to provide for a sustainable future
for the Messianic community. We should be about
the Lord’s work truly equipping Messianic
Believers for the challenges of today, so
that they can be prepared for the challenges of
tomorrow—which may include the Great
Tribulation. But in order to be more prepared,
there is an entire array of theological issues
that needs to be considered that most of the
Messianic movement since 1967 has avoided (and
whether these issues have been avoided
purposefully or not is hard to determine).
If anything, it is time for us to no longer
avoid these issues.
For a further discussion of this and related
issues, consult the editor’s article “Are We
Really Ready for the End-Times?”
NOTES
[a]
LS, 161.
[b]
Charles C. Ryrie, ed.,
The Ryrie Study Bible, New American
Standard (Chicago: Moody Press, 1978),
1490.
posted 05 September, 2007
Fire Baptism:
Can you tell me what it means to be “baptized by
fire”?
John the Immerser (or “Baptist”)
is the one who references the baptism or
immersion by fire in his statements about the
coming of the Messiah. His words pertaining to
this immersion appear in the Gospels of Matthew
and Luke:
“As for me, I baptize you with
water for repentance, but He who is coming after
me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to
remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the
Holy Spirit and fire” (Matthew 3:11).
“John answered and said to them
all, ‘As for me, I baptize you with water; but
One is coming who is mightier than I, and I am
not fit to untie the thong of His sandals; He
will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire’”
(Luke 3:16).
Many, particularly among
Pentecostals and charismatics, will stop reading
the text as quoted above, and automatically
assume that “fire baptism” or “fire immersion”
is something that is a good thing. A
great number of songs, for example, have been
composed from the point of view of “the Spirit
surrounding us in your fire.” This, however, is
not a theologically correct statement to make.
In context with John’s entire statement, he is
actually describing two different baptisms
or immersions: some will receive the Holy
Spirit, and others will receive fire.
Continuing, John says the following:
“His winnowing fork is in His
hand, and He will thoroughly clear His threshing
floor; and He will gather His wheat into the
barn, but He will burn up the chaff with
unquenchable fire” (Matthew 3:12).
“His winnowing fork is in His
hand to thoroughly clear His threshing floor,
and to gather the wheat into His barn; but He
will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire”
(Luke 3:17).
Those who are the chaff are taken
out and burned. In this context, “fire baptism”
is by no means something good or something to be
pursued. An immersion by fire speaks of God’s
judgment upon unrepentant sinners.
For a further examination of this
issue, consult G.W. Bromiley’s article in
ISBE, “Baptism of Fire,” 1:426.
posted 26 September, 2006 |