|

POSTED 01 JANUARY, 2005
The
Babylons of Revelation 17 & 18
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
There are many beliefs and opinions as to what
end-time Babylon comprises among those who study
and examine end-time prophecy. They range from
believing that Ancient Babylon will be rebuilt
to that Babylon is a religious system to even
that Babylon the Great is the United States of
America. Some believe that Babylon represents a
system, while others interpret it as being a
literal city. Some of the views are somewhat
odd, and others are Biblically sound (at least
in their own right) and have points of validity.
In light of current events and the various
opinions surrounding what many believe end-time
Babylon to be, it is important to examine key
Scriptures that give us clues to its potential
identity, and what we should be aware of as we
examine the Last Days and what is to befall it.
We will discuss and examine three common aspects
to the Babylon phenomenon, which many
pre-millennial prophecy teachers will agree
with, based on Scripture references from
Revelation chs. 17 and 18:
1. Babylon as the end-time apostate
religious system
2. Babylon as a literal city on Planet Earth
3. Babylon as the worldwide antimessiah/antichrist
system
Babylon as the End-Time Apostate
Religious System
“And he carried me away in the Spirit into a
wilderness; and I saw a woman sitting on a
scarlet beast, full of blasphemous names, having
seven heads and ten horns. The woman was clothed
in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and
precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a
gold cup full of abominations and of the unclean
things of her immorality, and on her forehead a
name was written, a mystery, ‘BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.’ And I saw the
woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and
with the blood of the witnesses of Yeshua. When
I saw her, I wondered greatly” (Revelation
17:3-6).
The most common view in evangelical Christian
circles is that end-time Babylon is the apostate
religious system of the antimessiah/antichrist.
This certainly has merit, and is widely agreed
upon by many Messianics as well. This
interpretation is primarily based on Revelation
17:3-6 focused around the idea that this
religious system is led by the Roman Catholic
Church, and that “Babylon” is a symbolic
representation of Rome. Rome being
representative of “Babylon” is well-attested to
in the Apostolic Scriptures (New Testament) and
early Church writings. The Apostle Peter writes
his first letter from Rome, stating, “She who is
in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you
greetings, and so does
my son, Mark” (1
Peter 5:13). According to Christian tradition
from the Second Century, the Apostle Peter
traveled to the city of Rome with Mark, and it
is from Peter’s account of Yeshua’s life to
Mark, that Mark wrote his Gospel. This is
substantiated by the Fourth Century historian
Eusebius’ remarks in his book
Ecclesiastical
History:
“This account is given by Clement in the sixth
book of his Institutions, whose testimony
is corroborated also by that of Papias, bishop
of Hierapolis. But Peter made mention of Mark in
the first epistle, which he is also said to have
composed at the same city of Rome, and that he
showed this fact, by calling the city by an
unusual figure of speech, Babylon…” (2.15.2).[1]
Historically, Christian exegesis of Revelation
has usually equated any reference to “Babylon”
as being associated with the city of Rome. The
New Interpreter’s Study Bible Bible, noting
on 1 Peter 5:13, indicates that “Babylon,
a reference to Rome, identifies the letter’s
probable city of origin and alludes to the
letter’s exile motif.”[2]
Ancient Rome was a symbol of great opulence,
wealth, and corruption for the early Believers,
and Peter’s usage of “Babylon” is likely a
veiled reference to Rome to protect the
Believers from the forthcoming persecution they
would be facing. Understanding Rome’s position
as one of decadence, but also one of spiritual
evil, is important, because for a Jew of the
First Century the only other thing that he knew
to compare Rome to would have been Ancient
Babylon.
The Prophet Jeremiah said to Ancient Babylon,
“Babylon has been a golden cup in the hand of
the LORD,
intoxicating all the earth. The nations have
drunk of her wine; therefore the nations are
going mad” (Jeremiah 51:7). John the Apostle
writes in Revelation 17:6, telling us that he
“saw the woman drunk with the blood of the
saints, and with the blood of the witnesses of
Yeshua.” Here, Babylon is identified as “the
woman,” which likely distinguishes it from
Ancient Babylon in modern day Iraq, even though
there remain parallels. Consequently,
evangelical Protestants building on the belief
that Babylon is Rome, associate it with being
the Roman Catholic Church and the apostate
religious system that it represents.
For centuries, the
Roman Catholic Church, as a state church, has
persecuted and killed true Believers for their
faith. This occurred during the Reformation, the
Inquisition, Holocaust, or otherwise. It is true
that not all members of Roman Catholic clergy
were responsible for heinous acts of aggression,
because some have tried to be pious servants of
God, but many Catholic cardinals, bishops, and
priests have been responsible for terrible deeds
against the saints. These deeds have had to be
acknowledged in recent times as the Catholic
Church has become more ecumenical, and has
sought some limited reconciliation with Jews and
Protestants.
Theologically
speaking, Roman Catholicism is full of complete
mystery. A great number of Catholicism’s
practices and traditions, while claiming to be
from the Bible, in actuality originate in pagan
sun worship from Ancient Babylon via Rome. When
the Emperor Constantine made Christianity legal
with the Edict of Milan in 313 C.E., Fourth
Century Christian practice had to merge with
religious practices in the Roman Empire, making
the religion palatable to pagans. Some of this
was already taking place in the Christian Church
as early as the Third Century, as clergy sought
to merge Biblical ideas with pagan practice,
giving “Christian” meanings to pagan traditions,
in an effort to convert the heathen. Tertullian,
a mid-Third Century Christian leader, wrote:
“By us, to whom Sabbaths are strange, and the
new moons and festivals formerly beloved by God,
the Saturnalia and New-year’s and Midwinter’s
festivals and Matronalia are frequented—presents
come and go—New-year's gifts—games join their
noise—banquets join their din! Oh better
fidelity of the nations to their own sect, which
claims no solemnity of the Christians for
itself! Not the Lord’s day, not Pentecost, even
it they had known them, would they have shared
with us; for they would fear lest they should
seem to be Christians.
We are not
apprehensive lest we seem to be
heathens!
If any indulgence is to be granted to the flesh,
you have it” (On Idolatry 14).[3]
Some of the clergy,
being ignorant of the Torah, did not know of the
prohibition of not learning the ways of the
nations (Deuteronomy 18:9), and no doubt
participated in such things in ignorance.
However, as the Protestant Reformation took hold
in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, many
had to recognize (1) the opulence of
Catholicism, and how it could in no way be the
original, simple faith as laid out by the
Apostles, and (2) how many extra-, if not
non-Biblical, traditions, practices, and
theologies had swept into the Church and needed
to be purged. Having limited information at
their disposal, the Reformers eliminated as much
Catholic opulence as could directly see opposed
by the Scriptures. Of course, being humans they
still made errors, but they did attempt to get
Believers to return to the primacy of the Bible
and we as Messianics are in their debt.
One of the most common arguments given for
determining that the end-time Babylon of
Revelation 17 is the Roman Catholic Church is
that Rome is often called the “city on seven
hills.” Babylon is described as sitting on seven
mountains or hills as detailed in Revelation
17:9: “Here is the mind which has wisdom. The
seven heads are seven mountains on which the
woman sits.” Some take issue with this verse,
because the text appears to use “mountains,” as
opposed to “hills,” and thus Rome as a city is
disqualified. Expositors who point this out
sometimes have an allegorical interpretation of
the passage. But the Greek word rendered as
“mountain” or “hill” (NIV),
oros ( oroß),
often used in the LXX to render the Hebrew word
har (rh),
is employed in the Gospels speaking of Yeshua
and the crowds going up to the mountain, or
coming down from the mountain, speaking of the
rolling hills of the Galilee, as opposed to a
massive mountain that one must actually “climb.”[4]
Given the description of Babylon in Revelation
17, the opulence that it represents, and the
fact that it is “drunk with the blood of the
saints,” it cannot be Babylon in Iraq.
Understanding that Rome is indeed “the city on
seven hills,” and that oros can mean both
“mountain” and “hill,” referring to rolling
hills and not just giant mountains, is a
qualifier for Babylon here being Rome, and even
more specifically, being the Vatican and Roman
Catholic Church. This is the city that is
prophesied to be destroyed by God in Revelation
17:16:
“And the ten horns which you saw, and the beast,
these will hate the harlot and will make her
desolate and naked, and will eat her flesh and
will burn her up with fire.”
If the “prostitute” (NIV)
of Revelation is the city of Rome, here embodied
in an end-time ecumenical, apostate Roman
Catholic Church, that is presumably leading the
world religiously and is indeed “whoring” (to
adopt the KJV rendering) around with other
religions, leading the masses astray from the
truth of the Scriptures, then it would only make
sense for God to judge it. What is interesting,
of course, is that it is said that the “ten
horns” are those who “hate the harlot,” and they
are used by the Lord to exercise His judgment
upon her. Revelation 17:12 describes these ten
horns as having limited power with the beast, or
antimessiah/antichrist:
“The ten horns which
you saw are ten kings who have not yet received
a kingdom, but they receive authority as kings
with the beast for one hour.”
While not stated in
the text directly, why do these ten kings or
rulers only have authority with him for “one
hour”? Whether this represents a year, a month,
a week, a day, or even a literal hour is
unimportant, because it is a very short period
of time in comparison to the beast’s power which
is to last “a time, times, and half
a time”
(Daniel 12:7), generally agreed by pre-millennialists
to be three-and-a-half years. Could it be that
these political leaders hate the authority of
the Vatican, because as secularists its
religious authority gets in the way of their
authority? Could it be that in the Last Days
when the globalist agenda takes focus that there
is internal squabbling between secular and
religious powers, each of which has its own
plans for the world? Here, we just might see the
reason why Rome is destroyed. It is interesting
to note that the Scriptures tell us that the
antimessiah will have Roman ancestry (Daniel
9:26), and that if he arises from Europe as many
expect and the “ten horns” are European leaders,
that many Europeans disapprove strongly of
organized religion and the Catholic Church and
Europe is where the Catholic Church is
significantly losing the battle to secularism.
(This is in contrast to Latin America, where
almost 40% of the world’s Catholics live, and
Catholicism has a very strong foothold.) It
would not be surprising if such individuals are
responsible for burning the Vatican with fire as
Revelation 17:16 states. But this, of course,
remains speculation, and we will have to wait
and see.
The view that end-time Babylon is somehow
involved with the Roman Catholic Church is the
most commonly held view among evangelical
Christians and Messianics. However, are there
other aspects to Babylon that must also be
considered that do not directly relate to Roman
Catholicism and the Vatican? Are there aspects
that we have missed, and have applied to
something else that is not necessarily
religious?
J.K. McKee
(B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN
Online (www.tnnonline.net) and is a Messianic
apologist.
He is a 2009 recipient of the Zondervan Biblical
Languages Award for Greek.
He
is author of
numerous books, dealing with a wide range of
topics that are important for today’s
Messianic Believers. He has also written many articles on
theological issues,
and is presently focusing his attention on Messianic commentaries
of various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
Eusebius of Caesarea,
Ecclesiastical
History, trans. C.F. Cruse (Peabody,
MA: Hendrickson, 1998), 50.
[2]
Donald Senior, “The First Letter of
Peter,” in Walter J. Harrelson, et. al.,
New Interpreter’s Study Bible,
NRSV (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2003),
2188.
[3]
The Ante-Nicene Fathers, P.
Schaff, ed.;
Libronix Digital Library
System 1.0d: Church History Collection.
MS Windows XP. Garland, TX: Galaxie
Software. 2002.
[4]
TDNT
notes that “The LXX almost
always uses óros for Heb.
har,
which also means either a single
mountain or a range…Many sayings reflect
Palestinian geography, e.g., the city on
a hill (Mt. 5:14), the sheep left on the
hills (18:12)…” (W. Foerster, “óros,”
in Geoffrey W. Bromiley, ed.,
Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament, abrid. [Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 1985], pp 732-733).
|