: MAIN
: STATEMENT OF FAITH
: ABOUT THE EDITOR
: THEOLOGY ARTICLES
: FAQ
: BIBLE MESSAGES
: BIBLE STUDY
: TORAH READINGS
: HEBREW/GREEK FONTS

: PRODUCTS (OIM)
   : Books
   : Commentaries
   : eBooks
: SUPPORT (OIM)
: THEOLOGICAL
  RESOURCES

: CONTACT US
: COPYRIGHT POLICY

: OUTREACH ISRAEL
: YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Become a fan of Outreach Israel Ministries on Facebook!

Follow OutreachIsrael on Twitter!



POSTED 01 JANUARY, 2005

The Babylons of Revelation 17 & 18

by J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net


 

There are many beliefs and opinions as to what end-time Babylon comprises among those who study and examine end-time prophecy. They range from believing that Ancient Babylon will be rebuilt to that Babylon is a religious system to even that Babylon the Great is the United States of America. Some believe that Babylon represents a system, while others interpret it as being a literal city. Some of the views are somewhat odd, and others are Biblically sound (at least in their own right) and have points of validity. In light of current events and the various opinions surrounding what many believe end-time Babylon to be, it is important to examine key Scriptures that give us clues to its potential identity, and what we should be aware of as we examine the Last Days and what is to befall it.

We will discuss and examine three common aspects to the Babylon phenomenon, which many pre-millennial prophecy teachers will agree with, based on Scripture references from Revelation chs. 17 and 18:

1. Babylon as the end-time apostate religious system
2. Babylon as a literal city on Planet Earth
3. Babylon as the worldwide antimessiah/antichrist system

Babylon as the End-Time Apostate Religious System

“And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness; and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast, full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns. The woman was clothed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a gold cup full of abominations and of the unclean things of her immorality, and on her forehead a name was written, a mystery, ‘BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.’ And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the witnesses of Yeshua. When I saw her, I wondered greatly” (Revelation 17:3-6).

The most common view in evangelical Christian circles is that end-time Babylon is the apostate religious system of the antimessiah/antichrist. This certainly has merit, and is widely agreed upon by many Messianics as well. This interpretation is primarily based on Revelation 17:3-6 focused around the idea that this religious system is led by the Roman Catholic Church, and that “Babylon” is a symbolic representation of Rome. Rome being representative of “Babylon” is well-attested to in the Apostolic Scriptures (New Testament) and early Church writings. The Apostle Peter writes his first letter from Rome, stating, “She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you greetings, and so does my son, Mark” (1 Peter 5:13). According to Christian tradition from the Second Century, the Apostle Peter traveled to the city of Rome with Mark, and it is from Peter’s account of Yeshua’s life to Mark, that Mark wrote his Gospel. This is substantiated by the Fourth Century historian Eusebius’ remarks in his book Ecclesiastical History:

“This account is given by Clement in the sixth book of his Institutions, whose testimony is corroborated also by that of Papias, bishop of Hierapolis. But Peter made mention of Mark in the first epistle, which he is also said to have composed at the same city of Rome, and that he showed this fact, by calling the city by an unusual figure of speech, Babylon…” (2.15.2).[1]

Historically, Christian exegesis of Revelation has usually equated any reference to “Babylon” as being associated with the city of Rome. The New Interpreter’s Study Bible Bible, noting on 1 Peter 5:13, indicates that “Babylon, a reference to Rome, identifies the letter’s probable city of origin and alludes to the letter’s exile motif.”[2] Ancient Rome was a symbol of great opulence, wealth, and corruption for the early Believers, and Peter’s usage of “Babylon” is likely a veiled reference to Rome to protect the Believers from the forthcoming persecution they would be facing. Understanding Rome’s position as one of decadence, but also one of spiritual evil, is important, because for a Jew of the First Century the only other thing that he knew to compare Rome to would have been Ancient Babylon.

The Prophet Jeremiah said to Ancient Babylon, “Babylon has been a golden cup in the hand of the LORD, intoxicating all the earth. The nations have drunk of her wine; therefore the nations are going mad” (Jeremiah 51:7). John the Apostle writes in Revelation 17:6, telling us that he “saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the witnesses of Yeshua.” Here, Babylon is identified as “the woman,” which likely distinguishes it from Ancient Babylon in modern day Iraq, even though there remain parallels. Consequently, evangelical Protestants building on the belief that Babylon is Rome, associate it with being the Roman Catholic Church and the apostate religious system that it represents.

For centuries, the Roman Catholic Church, as a state church, has persecuted and killed true Believers for their faith. This occurred during the Reformation, the Inquisition, Holocaust, or otherwise. It is true that not all members of Roman Catholic clergy were responsible for heinous acts of aggression, because some have tried to be pious servants of God, but many Catholic cardinals, bishops, and priests have been responsible for terrible deeds against the saints. These deeds have had to be acknowledged in recent times as the Catholic Church has become more ecumenical, and has sought some limited reconciliation with Jews and Protestants.

Theologically speaking, Roman Catholicism is full of complete mystery. A great number of Catholicism’s practices and traditions, while claiming to be from the Bible, in actuality originate in pagan sun worship from Ancient Babylon via Rome. When the Emperor Constantine made Christianity legal with the Edict of Milan in 313 C.E., Fourth Century Christian practice had to merge with religious practices in the Roman Empire, making the religion palatable to pagans. Some of this was already taking place in the Christian Church as early as the Third Century, as clergy sought to merge Biblical ideas with pagan practice, giving “Christian” meanings to pagan traditions, in an effort to convert the heathen. Tertullian, a mid-Third Century Christian leader, wrote:

“By us, to whom Sabbaths are strange, and the new moons and festivals formerly beloved by God, the Saturnalia and New-year’s and Midwinter’s festivals and Matronalia are frequented—presents come and go—New-year's gifts—games join their noise—banquets join their din! Oh better fidelity of the nations to their own sect, which claims no solemnity of the Christians for itself! Not the Lord’s day, not Pentecost, even it they had known them, would they have shared with us; for they would fear lest they should seem to be Christians. We are not apprehensive lest we seem to be heathens! If any indulgence is to be granted to the flesh, you have it” (On Idolatry 14).[3]

Some of the clergy, being ignorant of the Torah, did not know of the prohibition of not learning the ways of the nations (Deuteronomy 18:9), and no doubt participated in such things in ignorance. However, as the Protestant Reformation took hold in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, many had to recognize (1) the opulence of Catholicism, and how it could in no way be the original, simple faith as laid out by the Apostles, and (2) how many extra-, if not non-Biblical, traditions, practices, and theologies had swept into the Church and needed to be purged. Having limited information at their disposal, the Reformers eliminated as much Catholic opulence as could directly see opposed by the Scriptures. Of course, being humans they still made errors, but they did attempt to get Believers to return to the primacy of the Bible and we as Messianics are in their debt.

One of the most common arguments given for determining that the end-time Babylon of Revelation 17 is the Roman Catholic Church is that Rome is often called the “city on seven hills.” Babylon is described as sitting on seven mountains or hills as detailed in Revelation 17:9: “Here is the mind which has wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits.” Some take issue with this verse, because the text appears to use “mountains,” as opposed to “hills,” and thus Rome as a city is disqualified. Expositors who point this out sometimes have an allegorical interpretation of the passage. But the Greek word rendered as “mountain” or “hill” (NIV), oros (oroß), often used in the LXX to render the Hebrew word har (rh), is employed in the Gospels speaking of Yeshua and the crowds going up to the mountain, or coming down from the mountain, speaking of the rolling hills of the Galilee, as opposed to a massive mountain that one must actually “climb.”[4]

Given the description of Babylon in Revelation 17, the opulence that it represents, and the fact that it is “drunk with the blood of the saints,” it cannot be Babylon in Iraq. Understanding that Rome is indeed “the city on seven hills,” and that oros can mean both “mountain” and “hill,” referring to rolling hills and not just giant mountains, is a qualifier for Babylon here being Rome, and even more specifically, being the Vatican and Roman Catholic Church. This is the city that is prophesied to be destroyed by God in Revelation 17:16:

“And the ten horns which you saw, and the beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her desolate and naked, and will eat her flesh and will burn her up with fire.”

If the “prostitute” (NIV) of Revelation is the city of Rome, here embodied in an end-time ecumenical, apostate Roman Catholic Church, that is presumably leading the world religiously and is indeed “whoring” (to adopt the KJV rendering) around with other religions, leading the masses astray from the truth of the Scriptures, then it would only make sense for God to judge it. What is interesting, of course, is that it is said that the “ten horns” are those who “hate the harlot,” and they are used by the Lord to exercise His judgment upon her. Revelation 17:12 describes these ten horns as having limited power with the beast, or antimessiah/antichrist:

“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but they receive authority as kings with the beast for one hour.”

While not stated in the text directly, why do these ten kings or rulers only have authority with him for “one hour”? Whether this represents a year, a month, a week, a day, or even a literal hour is unimportant, because it is a very short period of time in comparison to the beast’s power which is to last “a time, times, and half a time” (Daniel 12:7), generally agreed by pre-millennialists to be three-and-a-half years. Could it be that these political leaders hate the authority of the Vatican, because as secularists its religious authority gets in the way of their authority? Could it be that in the Last Days when the globalist agenda takes focus that there is internal squabbling between secular and religious powers, each of which has its own plans for the world? Here, we just might see the reason why Rome is destroyed. It is interesting to note that the Scriptures tell us that the antimessiah will have Roman ancestry (Daniel 9:26), and that if he arises from Europe as many expect and the “ten horns” are European leaders, that many Europeans disapprove strongly of organized religion and the Catholic Church and Europe is where the Catholic Church is significantly losing the battle to secularism. (This is in contrast to Latin America, where almost 40% of the world’s Catholics live, and Catholicism has a very strong foothold.) It would not be surprising if such individuals are responsible for burning the Vatican with fire as Revelation 17:16 states. But this, of course, remains speculation, and we will have to wait and see.

The view that end-time Babylon is somehow involved with the Roman Catholic Church is the most commonly held view among evangelical Christians and Messianics. However, are there other aspects to Babylon that must also be considered that do not directly relate to Roman Catholicism and the Vatican? Are there aspects that we have missed, and have applied to something else that is not necessarily religious?



J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net) and is a Messianic apologist. He is a 2009 recipient of the Zondervan Biblical Languages Award for Greek. He is author of numerous books, dealing with a wide range of topics that are important for todays Messianic Believers. He has also written many articles on theological issues, and is presently focusing his attention on Messianic commentaries of various books of the Bible.

NOTES

[1] Eusebius of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History, trans. C.F. Cruse (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998), 50.

[2] Donald Senior, “The First Letter of Peter,” in Walter J. Harrelson, et. al., New Interpreter’s Study Bible, NRSV (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2003), 2188.

[3] The Ante-Nicene Fathers, P. Schaff, ed.; Libronix Digital Library System 1.0d: Church History Collection. MS Windows XP. Garland, TX: Galaxie Software. 2002.

[4] TDNT notes that “The LXX almost always uses óros for Heb. har, which also means either a single mountain or a range…Many sayings reflect Palestinian geography, e.g., the city on a hill (Mt. 5:14), the sheep left on the hills (18:12)…” (W. Foerster, “óros,” in Geoffrey W. Bromiley, ed., Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, abrid. [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1985], pp 732-733).



Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New American Standard, Updated Edition (NASU),
© 1995, published by The Lockman Foundation.

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 


Information on this website is © 1999-2012 TNN Online
and may not be reproduced without permission.